A workflow for turning a person's video-editing habits into a reusable editing skill file. It examines choices such as pacing, storytelling, audio, subtitles, colour, transitions, and recurring editing rules.
A workflow for creating, improving, or evaluating reusable coding-agent skills from repeatable procedures, prompts, scripts, or standard operating instructions.
Q: What is DESIGNFAQ.mdx for? A: Explains why Guild repo decisions were made (meta-layer charter, skills vs plugins, ADRs, validation). Use when changing architecture, inclusion criteria, or documenting rationale. Path: docs/DESIGNFAQ.mdx.
Instructions for Arenukvern/skill_steward, a project described as: “What’s the thing?” You’d answer: “Skills that teach you how to maintain skills & repos”. Engineering Stewardship for any repository (app, library, tool), a structural governance and quality layer for agent-operated engineering repos.
Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof…
Steward public stories about any work — creation ethics, application ethics, and maintenance of the story plus its disclosures (generated, drafted, curated, authored). Use when writing a public article, origin story, talk, README narrative, or showcase about how work was made; when publishing ethics and decisions; or…
End-to-end workflow for rewriting a book, long PDF, EPUB, manual, course, guideline library, same-domain multi-book source pack, large database, or methodology into an agent-native LingTai / Agent Skill structure. Use when the task is not a summary, but a reusable skill/knowledge system: source triage…
A review tool for deciding whether a coding-agent skill is safe and worthwhile to install. It checks for risky behavior and scores how precisely, effectively, and efficiently the skill works.
A review tool for checking whether another coding-agent skill is well designed. It examines how the skill is triggered, how its instructions are organized, and which parts can be removed without changing its behavior.
A Chinese-language design guide for creating teams of specialised coding agents and the skills they use. It is intended for Claude Code and focuses on simplified Chinese.
A simplified-Chinese meta-skill for designing and maintaining a harness, meaning a coordinated system of agents and skills for a project or field. It audits the current setup, defines agent roles, creates skills, and keeps the setup synchronized.
Use when about to return a non-measurable output — writing, proposals, plans, explanations, designs, drafts, or any artifact whose quality is judged rather than tested. Also use when the user says "second pass this", "grade this", "is this good enough?", "self-judge", "iterate on this". Do NOT use for measurable…
Internal subagent for the Second Pass skill. Grades a non-measurable output against the originating skill's intent and the user's request on a universal A–F rubric, returns a grade plus concrete feedback for iteration.
Toggle Second Pass re-judge after revision. true = verify lift in a loop (more tokens, more confidence). false = trust judge's feedback, ship after one revision (default, cheaper).
Set the Second Pass iteration cap — the max number of revision attempts before the skill delivers the best attempt and stops. Accepts a positive integer.