Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills --skill launch-tier-frameworkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills/launch-tier-framework)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills/launch-tier-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills/launch-tier-framework/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills/launch-tier-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills/launch-tier-framework.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.03358 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01679 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00672 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00336 |
Grade A, and why
launch-tier-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to launch-tier-framework — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 383 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Launch Tier Framework
When to use
Use this skill when you need to decide how big a launch should be, what GTM motions it deserves, and how multiple product moments should fit into a broader launch season.
Use it for:
- Classifying roadmap items into launch tiers
- Deciding whether a feature needs its own launch moment or should be bundled into a bigger narrative
- Building a launch plan that does not depend on one Big Bang launch day
- Aligning Product, PMM, Campaigns, PR/AR, Sales, CS, Support, and executive stakeholders
- Defending launch investment decisions with a consistent framework
- Turning a release train or roadmap into a season-of-launch plan tied to company goals
Do not use it as a generic campaign calendar. The point is to make launch scope, narrative, channels, and cross-functional investment match the strategic importance of each product moment.
Required inputs
Ask for or infer these inputs. If an input is missing, state the assumption and mark confidence as low.
- Company or product context
- Roadmap item, feature, release, integration, package, or product name
- Target customer segment and persona
- Customer problem or job to be done
- Business goal the launch should support: awareness, usage/adoption, revenue, retention, expansion, category perception, customer confidence, or competitive response
- Strategic importance to the company or product line
- Customer impact: new buyer value, user workflow change, adoption potential, retention impact, or risk reduction
- Revenue or pipeline potential, if known
- Competitive or market relevance
- Proof points, customer evidence, demos, screenshots, beta results, or stories
- Timing constraints, launch window, dependencies, and roadmap confidence
- Available GTM resources across Product, PMM, Campaigns, PR/AR, Sales, CS, Support, Web, Content, and Exec
- Related roadmap items that could be bundled into a bigger story
Core principles
- A launch is not one day. Launch day can create top-of-funnel attention, but follow-on tactics move people through consideration, acquisition, adoption, expansion, and retention.
- Build a Season of Launch tied to broader company goals, not a single Big Bang moment that exhausts all effort at announcement.
- The tier is a resource-allocation decision, not a vanity label.
- The same core launch content should be repurposed across sales enablement, videos, case studies, demos, customer comms, campaign assets, analyst briefings, and the sales toolkit.
- A good framework makes tradeoffs explicit and defensible. It helps teams say why one launch gets PR, exec support, and a full campaign while another gets targeted enablement and lifecycle comms.
- Smaller features can be bundled into a bigger narrative when they support the same customer problem, audience, or strategic theme.
- Divergent features should not be forced into one story. They may need smaller separate moments if they serve different personas, segments, buying triggers, or business goals.
- Launch intensity should follow customer value, business impact, market relevance, and proof. Not internal excitement.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 383 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A f50ab4e2fc49
launch-tier-framework is a skill published in the GitHub repository adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,358 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to launch-tier-framework, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-to-market-playbook
A reusable Go-to-Market strategy template for both B2B and B2C launches. Covers positioning, messaging, ICP definition, channel selection, and competitive analysis frameworks. By @WeiYipei.
adoption-leaderboard
Scores a rep's or a team's recent sales calls against a fixed set of five winning-behavior checklists (rapport, upsell signals, renewal risk, customer experience, value realization), then ranks reps lowest-adoption-first so the highest-leverage coaching targets lead. Use when running a team calibration, prepping 1:1…
challenger
Audits a B2B sales call transcript against the Challenger Sale framework (teach, tailor, take control, plus the commercial-teaching pitch arc), or sweeps a CRM export for deals with no teaching insight logged. Use when a rep leans on discovery-question skill but rarely brings a point of view, when prepping a rep for a…
champion-tracker
Tracks champion strength across a deal's call(s) — builds an action ledger, one row per named contact per cited quote, tagging each as either an act of internal selling (looping in a stakeholder, pushing back for the rep in a room the rep wasn't in) or mere positive sentiment (encouraging words, no action), then reads…
end-client-registration
Audits a partner/reseller's end-client deal registration for completeness — partner identity, end-client entity kept distinct from the partner, engagement scope, conflict check against the direct pipeline, confirmed permission to engage the end-client contact, commercial terms, and an expiry window. Use when reviewing…
executive-briefing
Writes the short brief a rep sends upward out of one deal — to their own exec or the buyer's exec sponsor — covering deal snapshot, status, what's at risk, and the ask, each claim cited to a quote or a CSV column/cell. Use when someone who will never read the transcript needs to act on one deal, not a call-by-call…