Medical Research Agent Skills is a library of agent instructions for medical and biomedical research, covering evidence analysis, study protocol design, data analysis, and academic writing. Researchers use it to guide compatible coding agents through common scientific workflows. The catalogue contains many of the library's skills and commands.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill arxiv-preflightgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/arxiv-preflight)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/arxiv-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/arxiv-preflight/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/arxiv-preflight"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/arxiv-preflight.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00141 | $0.01616 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00071 | $0.00808 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv-preflight scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
arXiv Preflight
Submission-readiness review for a manuscript before arXiv upload. The goal is not to judge whether a paper was AI-written from style. The goal is to find concrete, locatable, reviewable evidence of unchecked LLM output, hallucinated references, placeholder data, unsupported claims, and arXiv-policy risks — and to hand the author a fix list.
Anchor on the actual arXiv stance: authors may use generative AI tools but are fully responsible for the content and must disclose significant use per field norms; AI tools cannot be listed as authors. See references/arxiv_policy_notes.md for the exact language.
This skill is intentionally platform-neutral. It should work for any AI coding/review agent that can read files and run local Python scripts; it does not require OpenAI-specific UI metadata.
Requires Python 3.9+.
Workflow
-
Identify inputs. Ask for or detect: LaTeX project directory, single PDF, BibTeX file, supplementary figures/tables, or experiment data. Prefer LaTeX source over rendered PDF — PDF text extraction loses structure and produces noisier reference checks.
-
Extract manuscript text. Run
scripts/extract_manuscript_text.pyon the input. It merges\input/\include, strips LaTeX commands while preserving section/figure/table/citation keys, and falls back to PDF text extraction. Output:manuscript.jsonwithsections,figures,tables,cite_keys,numbers, andwarnings. Treat unresolved or skipped includes as review risks. -
Hard-red-line scan. Run
scripts/scan_ai_artifacts.pyagainst the extracted text. It flags LLM meta-comments, prompt residue, placeholder content, TODO/TBD/XX%, and AI-listed-as-author. Patterns live inreferences/ai_artifact_patterns.md— extend the list when the user reports new failure modes. Any hit is aBLOCKERunless the user explicitly justifies it.
What ships with it
21 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- eval_report_arxiv-preflight_result.json 13 KB
- evals/evals.json 3.7 KB
- evals/fixtures/clean/main.tex 1.5 KB
- evals/fixtures/clean/refs.bib 317 B
- evals/fixtures/hallucinated_ref/main.tex 869 B
- evals/fixtures/hallucinated_ref/refs.bib 1.5 KB
- evals/fixtures/llm_meta/main.tex 1.1 KB
- evals/fixtures/llm_meta/refs.bib 269 B
- evals/fixtures/multifile/intro.tex 159 B
- evals/fixtures/multifile/main.tex 223 B
- evals/fixtures/multifile/method.tex 87 B
- evals/fixtures/multifile/refs.bib 266 B
- evals/fixtures/multifile/results.tex 105 B
- references/ai_artifact_patterns.md 6.8 KB
- references/arxiv_policy_notes.md 4.2 KB
- references/reference_verification.md 4.9 KB
- references/report_template.md 3.7 KB
- scripts/extract_manuscript_text.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_preflight_report.py 16 KB runs code
- scripts/scan_ai_artifacts.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/verify_references.py 20 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 72 lines · 141 tokens per session scan A c5b8ad463b85
arxiv-preflight is a skill published in the GitHub repository aipoch/medical-research-skills (1,860 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 141 tokens to every session and 1,616 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
statistical-modeling
Statistical modeling and machine learning for biomarker discovery, survival analysis, classification, regression, and model interpretation.
bulk-transcriptomics
Bulk RNA-seq and microarray differential expression analysis including method selection, batch correction, and complex experimental designs.
chromatin-regulation
Chromatin regulation analysis from called peaks and count matrices — differential binding, signal summarisation, peak annotation, and scATAC-seq.
spatial-omics
Spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics analysis covering technology-specific workflows, spatial statistics, deconvolution, and niche analysis.
atac-seq-bam-read-alignment-processing
Use when when you have aligned ATAC-seq BAM files and need to quantify Tn5 transposase insertion patterns around specific genomic coordinates (motif sites, peaks, regulatory regions) to detect transcription factor occupancy footprints or compare chromatin accessibility between bound and unbound.
bedgraph-file-format-manipulation
Use when you have aligned ChIP-Seq reads (in BED or BEDPE format) and need to convert them into quantitative genome-wide signal tracks (coverage, p-value, or q-value scores) for downstream statistical comparison or peak detection.