Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add inflexa-ai/inflexa --skill bulk-transcriptomicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/inflexa-ai/inflexaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/bulk-transcriptomics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/bulk-transcriptomics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/bulk-transcriptomics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/bulk-transcriptomics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/bulk-transcriptomics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01684 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
bulk-transcriptomics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bulk Transcriptomics
Method selection and execution guidance for bulk RNA-seq and microarray differential expression analysis.
Method Selection Decision Tree
Choose the DE method based on input data type, sample size, and experimental design:
Input data?
├── Raw integer counts (RNA-seq)
│ ├── Simple design (2 conditions, no interaction terms)
│ │ ├── n >= 3 per group, n <= 50 per group → PyDESeq2 (Python, default)
│ │ ├── n = 2 per group → edgeR QLF via rpy2 (better small-sample performance)
│ │ ├── No biological replication in any group (1 vs 1) → NO inferential DE.
│ │ │ Report descriptive log2 fold changes only, and state why
│ │ │ (see Anti-Patterns)
│ │ └── n > 50 per group → limma-voom via rpy2 (faster, scales well)
│ ├── Complex design (interaction terms, >2 factors, nested)
│ │ ├── Standard factorial/interaction → DESeq2 via rpy2 (full formula support)
│ │ └── Large n or many covariates → limma-voom via rpy2
│ ├── Longitudinal / repeated measures
│ │ └── dream (variancePartition) via rpy2 (mixed-effects voom)
│ └── Batch effects present
│ ├── Known batches → sva ComBat_seq on raw counts, then DE as above
│ └── Unknown confounders → svaseq to estimate surrogate variables, include in model
├── Pre-normalized data (TPM, FPKM, RPKM, log-CPM, microarray intensities)
│ └── limma via rpy2 (do NOT use DESeq2/edgeR — they require raw counts)
└── Raw microarray CEL / intensity files
└── Out of scope. Reading them resolves a platform design package per array
design, which cannot be staged for every design and cannot be installed.
Report that and ask for the normalized expression matrix — every array
platform publishes one, and it enters the branch above.
Workflow Phases
- Data ingestion: Load count matrix + sample metadata. Verify counts are raw integers.
- QC: Library size distribution, gene detection rates, PCA for outlier detection.
- Filtering: Remove low-count genes (e.g., keep genes with >= 10 counts in >= n samples where n is the smallest group size).
- Batch assessment: PCA colored by batch — if batch clusters dominate, apply correction.
- Normalization: Handled internally by each method (DESeq2 median-of-ratios, edgeR TMM, limma-voom). Do NOT pre-normalize.
- DE testing: Apply the method from the decision tree. Extract results with log2FC, p-value, adjusted p-value.
- Downstream: Pathway enrichment via decoupler, volcano/MA plots.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 98 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A c4e2507fc254
bulk-transcriptomics is a skill published in the GitHub repository inflexa-ai/inflexa (33 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,684 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
sc-de
Load when finding marker genes per cluster or comparing condition expression in single-cell RNA-seq. Skip when the data is bulk (use bulkrna-de); spatial (use spatial-de); cluster-only markers without conditions (use sc-markers).
bulkrna-de
Load when comparing gene expression between two conditions in bulk RNA-seq count data. Skip when the data is single-cell (use sc-de); spatial (use spatial-de); you need exon-level alternative splicing (use bulkrna-splicing).
biosymphony-structure-factory
Use when planning structural biology campaigns, binder-design triage, model comparison, structure mapping, RunPod or cloud GPU stage contracts, or Symphony or Linear task packs for long-running biological agent work.
binder-lane-round
Plan and run study-shaped protein-binder rounds with interchangeable toolchains, execution profiles, license gates, output checks, and result boundaries.
alphafold
Skill for protein structure prediction and analysis with AlphaFold. Use this skill whenever a user wants to predict or fetch a protein 3D structure, download structures from the AlphaFold Database (AFDB), run ColabFold for novel proteins, parse pLDDT confidence scores or PAE (predicted aligned error) from AlphaFold…
esm2
Skill for working with ESM2 protein language models from Meta FAIR. Use this skill whenever the user wants to generate protein embeddings or representations, score variant effects or predict mutation fitness, run contact prediction, or use ESMFold for structure prediction. Also trigger when the user mentions ESM2…