Medical Research Agent Skills is a library of agent instructions for medical and biomedical research, covering evidence analysis, study protocol design, data analysis, and academic writing. Researchers use it to guide compatible coding agents through common scientific workflows. The catalogue contains many of the library's skills and commands.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.05227 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.02613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00523 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to literature-review — 174 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 612 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review
Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
This skill integrates with multiple scientific skills for database access (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client) and provides specialized tools for citation verification, result aggregation, and document generation.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
When NOT to Use This Skill
Do NOT use this skill when:
- Only a simple keyword search is needed (use gget or PubMed directly)
- The task is citation management/formatting only (use reference-style-sync)
- The user needs a single paper summary (use gget or direct reading)
- The task is bibliometric analysis only (use citation-chasing-mapping)
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every literature review MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
This is not optional. Literature reviews without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:
- Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., PRISMA flow diagram for systematic reviews)
- Prefer 2-3 figures for comprehensive reviews (search strategy flowchart, thematic synthesis diagram, conceptual framework)
How to generate figures:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/review_template.md 13 KB
- eval_report_literature-review_result.json 11 KB
- POLISH_CHANGELOG.md 637 B
- references/citation_styles.md 6.1 KB
- references/database_strategies.md 13 KB
- scripts/generate_pdf.py 5.5 KB runs code
- scripts/search_databases.py 9.1 KB runs code
- scripts/verify_citations.py 7.1 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 612 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 0304bb3557a7
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aipoch/medical-research-skills (1,869 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 5,227 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to literature-review, differing in 174 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
statistical-modeling
Statistical modeling and machine learning for biomarker discovery, survival analysis, classification, regression, and model interpretation.
bulk-transcriptomics
Bulk RNA-seq and microarray differential expression analysis including method selection, batch correction, and complex experimental designs.
chromatin-regulation
Chromatin regulation analysis from called peaks and count matrices — differential binding, signal summarisation, peak annotation, and scATAC-seq.
spatial-omics
Spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics analysis covering technology-specific workflows, spatial statistics, deconvolution, and niche analysis.
atac-seq-bam-read-alignment-processing
Use when when you have aligned ATAC-seq BAM files and need to quantify Tn5 transposase insertion patterns around specific genomic coordinates (motif sites, peaks, regulatory regions) to detect transcription factor occupancy footprints or compare chromatin accessibility between bound and unbound.
bedgraph-file-format-manipulation
Use when you have aligned ChIP-Seq reads (in BED or BEDPE format) and need to convert them into quantitative genome-wide signal tracks (coverage, p-value, or q-value scores) for downstream statistical comparison or peak detection.