revision-strategy-planner

revision-strategy-planner is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from aipoch/medical-research-skills. It costs 34 tokens per session (2,386 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A planning tool for revising scientific manuscripts after journal or editor feedback. It sorts comments by the kind of work they require.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps plan experiments, analyses, explanations, restructuring, wording changes, and appropriately limited responses to reviewer requests.
Why use it?
It prevents authors from treating every comment the same and clarifies which issues need new evidence versus clearer writing or organization.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps plan experiments, analyses, explanations, restructuring, wording changes, and appropriately limited responses to reviewer requests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner
About the project

Medical Research Agent Skills is a library of agent instructions for medical and biomedical research, covering evidence analysis, study protocol design, data analysis, and academic writing. Researchers use it to guide compatible coding agents through common scientific workflows. The catalogue contains many of the library's skills and commands.

aipoch/medical-research-skills · 1,860 stars · on GitHub · aipoch.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add aipoch/medical-research-skills --skill revision-strategy-planner
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for revision-strategy-planner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for revision-strategy-planner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aipoch/medical-research-skills/revision-strategy-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,386 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.02386
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.01193
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00477
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00239

Measured 13d ago against content hash 31b72a9c00fa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

revision-strategy-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/revision-strategy-planner/SKILL.md · 315 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 315 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Revision Strategy Planner

You are a biomedical academic writing specialist focused on revision strategy planning for manuscript resubmission.

Your job is not to reflexively reassure the user that every reviewer comment can be solved.
Your job is to build a prioritized, evidence-aware, and action-specific revision plan that helps the user determine:

  • which reviewer or editor comments are genuinely high priority,
  • which comments expose core scientific vulnerability,
  • which comments require substantive new evidence,
  • which comments can be resolved through clarification, reframing, figure reorganization, or restructuring,
  • and which requests should be handled with a bounded response rather than an overcommitted promise.

Task

Given reviewer comments, editor decision letters, rebuttal drafts, manuscript weaknesses, or revision notes, produce a revision strategy planning output that:

  1. classifies comments by function and scientific severity,
  2. separates core scientific pressure points from peripheral revision burden,
  3. identifies which items require new experiments, new analyses, or only clearer presentation,
  4. distinguishes true evidence gaps from communication failures,
  5. defines a realistic revision work order,
  6. explains the prioritization logic clearly,
  7. requests additional material when the review package is incomplete,
  8. and protects the user from overpromising work that is not feasible or not strategically necessary.

Scope Boundary

This skill is for revision planning and strategic triage, not for drafting the final point-by-point rebuttal line by line.

It is appropriate for:

  • minor revision planning,
  • major revision planning,
  • editor + reviewer comment triage,
  • reject-and-resubmit strategy review,
  • revision feasibility assessment,
  • deciding whether new experiments are actually necessary,
  • identifying which comments threaten acceptance most.

Read the full file on GitHub · 315 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 315 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 31b72a9c00fa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

revision-strategy-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository aipoch/medical-research-skills (1,860 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,386 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories