Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skillsnpx agentmods add skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-diffdockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-diffdock)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-diffdock"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-diffdock.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.03842 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01921 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00768 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00384 |
Grade A, and why
alterlab-diffdock scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to diffdock — 63 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 487 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DiffDock: Molecular Docking with Diffusion Models
Overview
DiffDock is a diffusion-based deep learning tool for molecular docking that predicts 3D binding poses of small molecule ligands to protein targets. It represents the state-of-the-art in computational docking, crucial for structure-based drug discovery and chemical biology.
Core Capabilities:
- Predict ligand binding poses with high accuracy using deep learning
- Support protein structures (PDB files) or sequences (via ESMFold)
- Process single complexes or batch virtual screening campaigns
- Generate confidence scores to assess prediction reliability
- Handle diverse ligand inputs (SMILES, SDF, MOL2)
Key Distinction: DiffDock predicts binding poses (3D structure) and confidence (prediction certainty), NOT binding affinity (ΔG, Kd). Always combine with scoring functions (GNINA, MM/GBSA) for affinity assessment.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- "Dock this ligand to a protein" or "predict binding pose"
- "Run molecular docking" or "perform protein-ligand docking"
- "Virtual screening" or "screen compound library"
- "Where does this molecule bind?" or "predict binding site"
- Structure-based drug design or lead optimization tasks
- Tasks involving PDB files + SMILES strings or ligand structures
- Batch docking of multiple protein-ligand pairs
Installation and Environment Setup
Check Environment Status
Before proceeding with DiffDock tasks, verify the environment setup:
# Use the provided setup checker
python scripts/setup_check.py
This script validates Python version, PyTorch with CUDA, PyTorch Geometric, RDKit, ESM, and other dependencies.
Installation Options
Option 1: Conda (Recommended)
git clone https://github.com/gcorso/DiffDock.git
cd DiffDock
conda env create --file environment.yml
conda activate diffdock
Option 2: Docker
docker pull rbgcsail/diffdock
docker run -it --gpus all --entrypoint /bin/bash rbgcsail/diffdock
micromamba activate diffdock
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/batch_template.csv 410 B
- assets/custom_inference_config.yaml 2.8 KB
- evals/evals.json 4.2 KB
- references/confidence_and_limitations.md 6.8 KB
- references/parameters_reference.md 5.0 KB
- references/workflows_examples.md 11 KB
- scripts/analyze_results.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/prepare_batch_csv.py 8.5 KB runs code
- scripts/setup_check.py 7.8 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 487 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 0ad3b6e710da
alterlab-diffdock is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills (64 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,842 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to diffdock, differing in 63 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
r-spss-syntax-architect
A guide for turning research hypotheses into repeatable R or SPSS code for statistical analysis. It covers panel data, where the same companies or other units are observed over time, as well as interaction effects, curves, and mediation.
ob-hrm-scale-adaptor
A guide for adapting organisational behaviour and human-resources survey scales across languages and cultures. It covers permission checks, translation and back-translation, expert review, participant interviews, and tests of whether groups interpret the scale comparably.
thesis-consistency-audit
A consistency audit for quantitative master’s and doctoral theses in management, finance, or strategy. It checks whether numbers, tables, analyses, and claims agree, and can inspect hidden author information in office documents.
management-figure
A chart-making toolkit for evidence-based management, finance, and strategy research. It creates publication-ready plots from regression results and tracking data, including coefficient, interaction, group-comparison, trend, and curved-relationship charts.
reproducibility-architect
A guide for packaging research so another person can rerun its data processing and analysis. A replication package is the project files, instructions, code, data guidance, and software details needed to reproduce published results.
journal-submission-scout
A research tool for choosing a journal for a completed paper. It searches for journals that publish similar work, compares public information such as citation data, fees, open-access listing, and review practices, and screens for warning signs of predatory journals, which charge authors without providing trustworthy publishing services.