Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-tiledbvcfgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-tiledbvcf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-tiledbvcf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-tiledbvcf/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-tiledbvcf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alterlab-ieu/alterlab-academic-skills/alterlab-tiledbvcf.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 42 Docker image references without a specific tag (:latest is implicit) or digest (@sha256:...) can be silently replaced by a malicious image.Fix: Pin the image: image:tag or image@sha256:abc123
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 43 Docker image references without a specific tag (:latest is implicit) or digest (@sha256:...) can be silently replaced by a malicious image.Fix: Pin the image: image:tag or image@sha256:abc123
- low Privilege Escalation · line 224 Skill requests more permissions than appear necessary for its stated functionality. Review if elevated access is justified.Fix: Request only the minimum permissions required. Document why each permission is needed. Remove broad permissions like '*' or 'all'.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.03310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01655 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00662 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00331 |
Grade A, and why
alterlab-tiledbvcf scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 335 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TileDB-VCF
Overview
TileDB-VCF is a high-performance C++ library with Python and CLI interfaces for efficient storage and retrieval of genomic variant-call data. Built on TileDB's sparse array technology, it enables scalable ingestion of VCF/BCF files, incremental sample addition without expensive merging operations, and efficient parallel queries of variant data stored locally or in the cloud.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Building a queryable, compressed variant store from many single-sample VCF/BCF files (cohort/population datasets too large for flat VCF)
- Incrementally adding new samples to an existing store without re-merging
- Querying specific genomic regions across many samples (region/sample-partitioned reads)
- Exporting region/sample subsets back to VCF/BCF for downstream tools
- Working with variant data on cloud storage (S3, Azure, GCS) or TileDB Cloud
- Prototyping or teaching scalable genomics-variant workflows
Quick Start
Installation
Preferred method: conda/mamba from the tiledb channel. tiledbvcf-py is NOT on PyPI, conda-forge, or bioconda — it ships from the tiledb Anaconda channel, with native osx-arm64 builds (no Rosetta/CONDA_SUBDIR workaround needed on Apple Silicon). Supports Python 3.9–3.12.
# Native Apple Silicon (osx-arm64) — also works on osx-64 / linux-64
conda create -n tiledb-vcf -c conda-forge -c tiledb \
python=3.12 tiledbvcf-py=0.40 pandas pyarrow numpy
conda activate tiledb-vcf
Alternative: Docker images (pulls the CLI/Python interface; latest tag tracks current release)
docker pull tiledb/tiledbvcf-py # Python interface
docker pull tiledb/tiledbvcf-cli # Command-line interface
Basic Examples
Create and populate a dataset:
import tiledbvcf
# Create a new dataset
ds = tiledbvcf.Dataset(uri="my_dataset", mode="w",
cfg=tiledbvcf.ReadConfig(memory_budget_mb=1024))
# Ingest VCF files (must be single-sample with indexes)
# Requirements:
# - VCFs must be single-sample (not multi-sample)
# - Must have indexes: .csi (bcftools) or .tbi (tabix)
ds.ingest_samples(["sample1.vcf.gz", "sample2.vcf.gz"])
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 335 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A ad37e2a56a50
alterlab-tiledbvcf is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills (66 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 3,310 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ob-hrm-scale-adaptor
A guide for adapting organisational behaviour and human-resources survey scales across languages and cultures. It covers permission checks, translation and back-translation, expert review, participant interviews, and tests of whether groups interpret the scale comparably.
r-spss-syntax-architect
A guide for turning research hypotheses into repeatable R or SPSS code for statistical analysis. It covers panel data, where the same companies or other units are observed over time, as well as interaction effects, curves, and mediation.
thesis-consistency-audit
A consistency audit for quantitative master’s and doctoral theses in management, finance, or strategy. It checks whether numbers, tables, analyses, and claims agree, and can inspect hidden author information in office documents.
management-figure
A chart-making toolkit for evidence-based management, finance, and strategy research. It creates publication-ready plots from regression results and tracking data, including coefficient, interaction, group-comparison, trend, and curved-relationship charts.
reproducibility-architect
A guide for packaging research so another person can rerun its data processing and analysis. A replication package is the project files, instructions, code, data guidance, and software details needed to reproduce published results.
journal-submission-scout
A research tool for choosing a journal for a completed paper. It searches for journals that publish similar work, compares public information such as citation data, fees, open-access listing, and review practices, and screens for warning signs of predatory journals, which charge authors without providing trustworthy publishing services.