medical-imaging-review

medical-imaging-review is a skill for Claude Code from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills. It costs 88 tokens per session (1,345 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A writing guide for literature reviews about artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Medical imaging includes scans and images such as CT, MRI, X-rays, ultrasound, and pathology images.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write survey papers, systematic reviews, or other literature analyses in medical-imaging AI.
Why use it?
It helps organize research findings when reviewing how AI is used for tasks such as segmentation, detection, or classification in medical images.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to write survey papers, systematic reviews, or other literature analyses in medical-imaging AI.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill medical-imaging-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for medical-imaging-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for medical-imaging-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/medical-imaging-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,345 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.01345
Opus 5.5 $0.00035 $0.00538
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00269
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00135

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9983ca3124bd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

medical-imaging-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/02-luwill-research-skills/medical-imaging-review/SKILL.md · 186 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 186 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 9983ca3124bd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

medical-imaging-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills (4,786 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,345 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

data-management-plan

Draft a funder-compliant Data Management Plan (NSF DMP, NIH DMS Policy 2023, ERC, Horizon Europe) by composing the confidential-data and environment-capture primitives. Sections cover data description, formats/metadata, storage/backup, access/sharing, preservation/archiving, and roles. Use when user says "data…

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow · 143 tokens

validate-bib

Validate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Structural checks (missing/unused entries, malformed fields) by default; --semantic adds citation-drift detection, DOI verification, and style-consistency checks.

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow · 47 tokens

amj-data-analysis

Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 81 tokens

construct-causal-model

Construct and validate an explicit causal model with measurable variables, mechanism edges, evidence links, feedback loops, interventions, counterevidence, and confidence.

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine · 34 tokens

audit-explanatory-compression

Test whether an elegant/simple explanation earns its compression by forbidding alternatives, subsuming independent facts, or making risky predictions, rather than merely relabeling observations with a compact vocabulary.

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine · 43 tokens

audit-validator-independence

Audit whether a validator, benchmark, sandbox, or test can pass by construction because it embeds the same assumptions as the theory it claims to validate. Build a claim×validator-assumption matrix and demand at least one non-circular failure channel.

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine · 54 tokens