claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflownpx agentmods add skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bibWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bib)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bib"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bib/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bib"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/validate-bib.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 80 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 151 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 152 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 153 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01627 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00651 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00325 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
validate-bib scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- validate-bib — 94% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validate Bibliography
Cross-reference citations in lecture files against bibliography entries. Two modes:
- Default (structural): missing entries, unused entries, malformed fields, typo candidates.
--semantic: adds citation-drift detection (duplicate entries for the same paper), DOI verification via crossref, and citation-style consistency within each file.
Report saved to quality_reports/bib_audit_[structural|semantic].md.
Mode 1: Structural (default)
Steps
-
Read the bibliography file and extract all citation keys.
-
Scan lecture files for citation keys:
.tex:\cite{,\citet{,\citep{,\citeauthor{,\citeyear{,\textcite{,\parencite{.qmd/.md:@key,[@key],[@key1; @key2]- Extract all unique citation keys used.
-
Cross-reference:
- Missing entries (CRITICAL): cited in lectures, absent from
.bib. - Unused entries (informational): in
.bibbut never cited. - Typo candidates: keys within edit-distance 2 of a
.bibkey (e.g.,Smith2020vsSmth2020).
- Missing entries (CRITICAL): cited in lectures, absent from
-
Check entry quality:
- Required fields present (author, title, year, journal/booktitle).
- Author field properly formatted.
- Year in 1900–current.
- No malformed characters / encoding issues.
doifield normalized (no leadinghttps://doi.org/).
-
Write report to
quality_reports/bib_audit_structural.md.
Files scanned
Slides/*.tex
Quarto/*.qmd
guide/*.qmd
master_supporting_docs/**/*.tex
Bibliography location
Bibliography_base.bib at repo root by default; override via CLAUDE.md.
Mode 2: Semantic (--semantic)
Everything in Mode 1, plus:
2a. Citation drift detection
Multiple .bib entries describing the same paper under different keys. Symptoms:
Smith2020+Smith2020awith identical DOI or title.CallawaySantAnna2021+CS2021both pointing to the same paper.- Collaborator-merged
.bibfiles.
Detection heuristics (any → FLAG):
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A f9045d13966d
validate-bib is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,670 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,627 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fin-paper-figure
Generate academic-quality figures (>=300 DPI) for economics and finance papers.
fin-paper-writing
A workflow for turning a research outline and study design into a complete economics or finance paper. It coordinates drafting, figure creation, consistency checks, review rounds, LaTeX compilation, and submission checks.
fin-viz-launch
A tool for turning research data and a written description into academic charts. It can choose a suitable chart type, create plotting code with matplotlib or seaborn, and save the result as a high-resolution PDF, SVG, or PNG.
fin-data-acquisition
A data-preparation workflow for financial research. It reads variable definitions from a completed research design and produces data-acquisition work plus executable Python or Stata regression scripts.
fin-lit-review
A systematic literature-review workflow for economics and finance. It searches several academic sources, maps how papers cite one another, and organizes the main findings and research gaps.
fin-submit-check
A pre-submission checklist for an academic paper and its LaTeX files. It checks journal requirements such as anonymous authorship, length, spacing, margins, citations, figures, data availability, and other submission details.