research-article-analysis

research-article-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from dbcls/togomcp. It costs 147 tokens per session (2,692 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research-paper checking workflow that tests scientific claims against structured biology databases such as ChEBI, Rhea, Reactome, UniProt, and Gene Ontology.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking molecular formulas, reaction equations, biological pathways, protein functions, enzyme numbers, and Gene Ontology definitions claim by claim.
Why use it?
It helps catch incorrect or unsupported details that may be missed when relying on a paper’s wording or ordinary keyword searches.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for checking molecular formulas, reaction equations, biological pathways, protein functions, enzyme numbers, and Gene Ontology definitions claim by claim.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add dbcls/togomcp --skill research-article-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbcls/togomcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for research-article-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for research-article-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dbcls/togomcp/research-article-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 147 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,692 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00147 $0.02692
Opus 5.5 $0.00059 $0.01077
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00029 $0.00538
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00269

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ecba1d11bed0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research-article-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

togo_mcp/data/skills/public/research-article-analysis/SKILL.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Research Article Analysis (claim validation via TogoMCP SPARQL)

Validate a paper claim-by-claim by running structured SPARQL against five RDF databases — ChEBI, Rhea, Reactome, UniProt, GO — and citing the query results (exact formulas, equations, EC numbers, GO definitions), not the paper's prose or keyword-search text. The driver is the TogoMCP MCP tools (run_sparql, the search_* tools, get_MIE_file).

The full phased checklist, ID-tracking templates, scoring rubric, and anti-skipping safeguards live in references/research_article_analysis.md — read it for the deliverable structure and discipline. This SKILL.md is the operational path: the SPARQL that actually works (the printed templates have two bugs — see Gotchas), the verified tool calls, and the traps.

Files under references/ are fetched with get_workflow(name="research-article-analysis", path="references/...") (when this skill is installed locally, read them as files instead).

Prerequisites

  • The TogoMCP tools (run_sparql, search_*, get_MIE_file) drive this skill.
  • Network access from that server to rdfportal.org.

Warm-up check (confirm connectivity before trusting the templates)

Before relying on the templates, send the ChEBI structure query below through the run_sparql tool and confirm it returns a row — that proves the endpoint is reachable and the (chemrof-namespace) pattern still resolves. If it returns nothing, that database's query type is broken (endpoint down or schema drift) — re-read its MIE via get_MIE_file and fix the pattern below before relying on it.

Run the analysis (phases, with verified queries)

Follow the phase discipline in the reference doc: 2A select databases (5 rules), 2B get_MIE_file(database=...) for each, 2C keyword-search to get IDs, 2D run 2+ SPARQL per database using those IDs, 3A reconstruct the DB-backed logical flow (results → conclusion) + 3B triage the gaps, 4 score flow soundness, then deliver the four-part FINAL SUMMARY (main claim / conclusion / DB-backed flow / gap analysis). Drive 2D with the TogoMCP run_sparql tool. The query types below were all run live (bile-acid example) and returned data — copy these, not the reference doc's printed templates.

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines ecba1d11bed0
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 1b926442dbe5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-article-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository dbcls/togomcp (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 2,692 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

open-ontologies

AI-native ontology engineering using 110 MCP tools backed by an in-memory Oxigraph triple store. Build, validate, query, and govern RDF/OWL ontologies with a generate-validate-iterate loop. Use when building ontologies, knowledge graphs, RDF data, SPARQL queries, BORO/4D modeling, SHACL validation, clinical…

fabio-rovai/open-ontologies · 109 tokens

post-cortex-memory

Long-term project memory through the post-cortex MCP server (tools named session, semanticsearch, updateconversationcontext, assemblecontext, queryconversationcontext, getstructuredsummary, manageworkspace, manageentity, admin). Use it whenever those tools are available and the work could benefit from what was learned…

julymetodiev/post-cortex · 194 tokens

ml_inference_optimization

This document describes the Leeroopedia MCP tools available during the with-KB benchmark run. It is a standalone reference and is not fed to the agents automatically.

Leeroo-AI/leeroopedia-mcp · 0 tokens

leeroopedia-mcp

Use Leeroopedia MCP to fetch grounded ML/AI best practices, build and review ML plans, debug failures, verify code/math correctness, and expand KB citations via getpage.

Leeroo-AI/leeroopedia-mcp · 42 tokens

midmem-research-tracker

Keep the repo's RESEARCH.md ledger current from the research ingestions already in the MidMem store: for every unevaluated weekly research ingestion, evaluate each paper's feasibility and applicable improvement for MidMem, and record it as Paper (cite + link) · Finding (the empirical claim that matters) · Decision…

U4CSolutions/MidMem · 160 tokens

nsides-query

Query the nSIDES drug side effect databases (OnSIDES, OffSIDES, KidSIDES). Use whenever the user asks about drug adverse reactions, side effects, off-label safety signals, or pediatric drug safety for a given drug name.

QSong-github/DrugClaw · 54 tokens