Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fossuav/aap --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fossuav/aapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossuav/aap/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossuav/aap/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fossuav/aap/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossuav/aap/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fossuav/aap/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.10541 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.04216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.02108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01054 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +30 lines da011376ec69
- 16d ago Changed d30c6400ee02
- 17d ago Changed 64e17af81651
- 25d ago Changed 16d3352b4449
- 28d ago Changed · +12 lines 44aa061a7b00
- 1mo ago Changed · +30 lines a85ccc00b9dc
- 1mo ago Changed · +56 lines 47cb05241aff
- 1mo ago Changed · +34 lines 309a43973dba
- 1mo ago Changed · +38 lines fda8b5e0e50d
- 1mo ago First seen · 296 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 94a6f51bf7d1
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fossuav/aap (19 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 10,541 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cpp-coding-standards
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
architecture-review
Review a diff or a branch range for the architecture drift lint cannot see. Run the scoped linters and the parity check first. Then work a checklist keyed to dev/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: new Api operations or contract shapes without a ruling, new or cut edges between modules, authorization or audit hand-rolled beside the…
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
prs-awaiting-maintainer
List open pull requests where the ball is in the maintainer's court: CI is green and the PR is ready for a maintainer to review, re-review, or merge. Use when the user wants to see PRs awaiting maintainer action.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…