Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FridrichMethod/awesome-skills --skill academic-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FridrichMethod/awesome-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fridrichmethod/awesome-skills/academic-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fridrichmethod/awesome-skills/academic-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fridrichmethod/awesome-skills/academic-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fridrichmethod/awesome-skills/academic-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fridrichmethod/awesome-skills/academic-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.12074 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.06037 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.02415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01207 |
Grade A, and why
academic-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
29 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/claim_ref_alignment_audit_agent.md 43 KB
- agents/collaboration_depth_agent.md 9.8 KB
- agents/integrity_verification_agent.md 66 KB
- agents/pipeline_orchestrator_agent.md 151 KB
- agents/state_tracker_agent.md 26 KB
- examples/full_pipeline_example.md 18 KB
- examples/integrity_failure_recovery.md 27 KB
- examples/mid_entry_example.md 13 KB
- references/adapters/.gitkeep 0 B
- references/adapters/overview.md 10.0 KB
- references/ai_research_failure_modes.md 15 KB
- references/changelog.md 5.8 KB
- references/claim_audit_calibration_protocol.md 14 KB
- references/claim_verification_protocol.md 27 KB
- references/external_review_protocol.md 6.2 KB
- references/integrity_review_protocol.md 7.1 KB
- references/literature_corpus_consumers.md 12 KB
- references/mode_advisor.md 7.8 KB
- references/passport_as_reset_boundary.md 18 KB
- references/pipeline_state_machine.md 26 KB
- references/plagiarism_detection_protocol.md 13 KB
- references/process_summary_protocol.md 15 KB
- references/progress_dashboard_template.md 1.5 KB
- references/reinforcement_content.md 1.4 KB
- references/reproducibility_audit.md 2.6 KB
- references/score_trajectory_protocol.md 3.8 KB
- references/team_collaboration_protocol.md 10 KB
- references/two_stage_review_protocol.md 2.7 KB
- templates/pipeline_status_template.md 3.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed dcb91d5b73ea
- 10d ago First seen · 737 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A 5b9b92ad1df7
academic-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository FridrichMethod/awesome-skills (15 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 12,074 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper-writer
Draft economics papers with proper structure and academic style.
distill-concept-books
A workflow for turning books about concepts, theories, or analysis methods into reusable task instructions. It scans document images, links claims to evidence, and checks the result through human review.
pixi-environment-builder
Use when creating, migrating, or debugging pixi environments, especially for scientific Python, bioinformatics, single-cell analysis, CUDA/PyTorch, Jupyter/VS Code kernels, conda-to-pixi migration, or conda + PyPI mixed dependency issues.
remote-compute-ssh
Submit recoverable SSH-direct research Runs with live progress cards and model-free monitoring.
analysis-workflow
Organize multi-step scientific analyses into reproducible, self-contained modules. Use for workflows such as QC→PCA→DEG→GSEA that produce scripts, inputs, figures, tables, and methods. Creates a stable module layout, records exact inputs/parameters/package and database versions in each module README, keeps large data…
bear-counter
A literature search that finds real academic papers challenging a claim through opposing findings, limits, alternative explanations, methodological criticism, or failed replications.