Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills --skill exp-competitive-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills/exp-competitive-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills/exp-competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills/exp-competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills/exp-competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills/exp-competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01645 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
exp-competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
竞品体验分析
从用户体验视角系统性对比竞品，识别体验差距、行业最佳实践和差异化机会，为体验优化提供基准和方向。
触发条件
- 需要从体验视角对比竞品
- 需要发现体验差距和差异化机会
- 需要了解行业体验最佳实践
- 产品需要重新定位体验策略
- 需要为体验优化设定基准目标
核心能力
1. 竞品选择
根据分析目标选择合适的竞品层次：
| 层次 | 定义 | 分析重点 |
|---|---|---|
| 直接竞品 | 同一品类、同一目标用户 | 功能体验对比、核心流程对比 |
| 间接竞品 | 不同品类但解决同一需求 | 替代方案体验、需求满足方式 |
| 参照标杆 | 体验最佳的行业标杆 | 最佳实践学习、标杆设定 |
| 跨界参照 | 跨行业的体验创新 | 体验创新启发、思维突破 |
竞品数量建议 3-5 个，过多则分析深度不足。
2. 体验分析维度
从以下维度系统对比竞品体验：
第一印象体验
- 首次打开的认知成本
- 新手引导的友好程度
- 核心价值的传达速度
核心流程体验
- 核心任务的完成路径长度
- 每步的操作复杂度
- 流程中的容错与恢复
- 完成后的反馈与闭环
信息架构体验
- 信息层级是否清晰
- 导航是否直觉
- 搜索效率如何
- 内容组织逻辑
交互细节体验
- 操作反馈是否即时
- 手势/快捷操作支持
- 动效是否辅助理解
- 错误提示是否友好
情感体验
- 视觉风格的情感传达
- 品牌个性的一致性
- 惊喜时刻的设计
- 情绪曲线的走势
服务体验（如适用）
- 帮助渠道的可达性
- 问题解决的效率
- 自助服务的完善度
- 人工服务的衔接
3. 分析方法
体验矩阵打分法
- 为每个维度设定 1-5 分评分标准
- 对自身和每个竞品打分
- 计算总分和各维度得分
- 识别优势/劣势/持平维度
关键流程对比法
- 选取 3-5 个核心流程
- 逐步骤对比竞品的处理方式
- 标注体验差异点和亮点
- 提炼可借鉴的做法
体验差距地图
- 以"体验重要性"和"当前表现"为两轴
- 将各维度定位到地图上
- 识别高重要-低表现的体验短板
- 识别高重要-高表现的优势领域
4. 差异化机会识别
从竞品分析的空白地带发现差异化机会：
- 竞品都做但体验差的领域 → 体验超越机会
- 竞品都未做的领域 → 体验创新机会
- 竞品各有优劣的领域 → 取长补短机会
- 行业标杆做法 → 快速学习机会
输出格式：竞品体验分析报告
【竞品体验分析报告】
▸ 分析目标：[...]
▸ 竞品选择：
直接竞品：[A]、[B]
间接竞品：[C]
参照标杆：[D]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 一、体验矩阵打分
维度 │ 本产品 │ 竞品A │ 竞品B │ 标杆D │ 差距
──────────────────┼────────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼──────
第一印象体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
核心流程体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
信息架构体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
交互细节体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
情感体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
服务体验 │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [X] │ [...]
──────────────────┼────────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼──────
总分 │ [XX] │ [XX] │ [XX] │ [XX] │
优势维度：[...]
劣势维度：[...]
持平维度：[...]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 二、关键流程对比
流程1：[流程名称]
本产品：[步骤数：X] → [关键差异] → [体验评价]
竞品A：[步骤数：X] → [关键差异] → [体验评价]
竞品B：[步骤数：X] → [关键差异] → [体验评价]
可借鉴：[...]
流程2：[...]
...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 三、体验差距地图
高重要 + 低表现（短板）：
1. [...]
2. [...]
高重要 + 高表现（优势）：
1. [...]
2. [...]
低重要 + 低表现（低优先）：
1. [...]
低重要 + 高表现（过度投入）：
1. [...]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 四、行业最佳实践
1. [做法]，来自：[竞品]，可借鉴度：[高/中/低]
2. [...]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 五、差异化机会
1. [机会1]，类型：[体验超越/体验创新/取长补短/快速学习]
2. [...]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
▸ 六、行动建议
紧急追赶（本月）：
1. [...]
中期优化（本季度）：
1. [...]
长期差异化（本年）：
1. [...]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 190 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 8c367bf710ea
exp-competitive-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository guofu-shiqu/ux-expert-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,645 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-taste-frontend
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
stitch-design-taste
Semantic Design System Skill for Google Stitch. Generates agent-friendly DESIGN.md files that enforce premium, anti-generic UI standards — strict typography, calibrated color, asymmetric layouts, perpetual micro-motion, and hardware-accelerated performance.
image-to-code
Elite website image-to-code skill for Codex. For visually important web tasks, it must first generate the design image(s) itself, deeply analyze them, then implement the website to match them as closely as possible. In Codex, it must prefer large, readable, section-specific images instead of tiny compressed boards…
imagegen-frontend-mobile
Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured…
imagegen-frontend-web
Elite frontend image-direction skill for generating premium, conversion-aware website design references. CRITICAL OUTPUT RULE — generate ONE separate horizontal image FOR EVERY section. A landing page with 8 sections produces 8 images. Never compress multiple sections into one image. Enforces composition variety (not…
design-taste-frontend-v1
The original v1 taste-skill, preserved for projects depending on its exact behavior. The current default is design-taste-frontend (v2 experimental), which is a substantial rewrite. Use this v1 install name only if you need exact backward compatibility.