Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill checksum-verification-for-reproducibilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/checksum-verification-for-reproducibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/checksum-verification-for-reproducibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/checksum-verification-for-reproducibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/checksum-verification-for-reproducibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/checksum-verification-for-reproducibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01318 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00527 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
checksum-verification-for-reproducibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
checksum-verification-for-reproducibility
Summary
Validate that a bioinformatics pipeline produces output that is byte-for-byte identical to reference outputs by computing and comparing cryptographic checksums (file hashes). This skill ensures reproducibility of complex workflows like Hi-C map generation by detecting any divergence in pipeline output due to parameter changes, software versions, or computational environments.
When to use
You have executed a complex multi-step processing pipeline (e.g., ENCODE Hi-C uniform processing pipeline) and need to confirm that the generated output files match a known reference baseline. Use this skill when reproducibility is a project requirement, when validating pipeline porting across compute platforms, or when comparing output from different pipeline versions or parameter sets against a trusted reference.
When NOT to use
- Output files are expected to differ due to stochastic components (e.g., random initialization, sampling-based algorithms); checksums will never match.
- Pipeline is under active development or rapid iteration; reference checksums may be outdated or unavailable.
- You are validating functional correctness rather than byte-for-byte reproducibility; use differential analysis, statistical comparison, or schema validation instead.
Inputs
- Output file from multi-step processing pipeline (e.g., .hic binary contact map file)
- Reference output file checksum (computed or provided by pipeline developers)
- Hash algorithm specification (e.g., SHA-256, MD5)
Outputs
- Computed checksum string for generated output file
- Checksum comparison result (match/mismatch)
- Reproducibility validation report (pass/fail)
How to apply
After running the pipeline (e.g., encode_hic_pipeline on FASTQ input to generate .hic binary files), compute the cryptographic hash (checksum) of the output file using a standard utility such as sha256sum or md5sum. Obtain or compute the corresponding checksum for the reference output file using the same hashing algorithm and on the same file format. Compare the two checksums byte-for-byte; if they match exactly, the pipeline has reproduced the reference output; if they differ, investigate pipeline parameters, software versions, input data provenance, and computational environment variables that may have caused divergence. Document the hashing algorithm and reference checksum as part of the pipeline validation record.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 595a682feb61
checksum-verification-for-reproducibility is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,318 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsva-analysis-and-visualization
Use this skill to run GSVA or ssGSEA pathway-level differential analysis from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, then generate a heatmap from the saved GSVA result object. Trigger keywords: GSVA, ssGSEA, pathway enrichment, KEGG pathway analysis, MSigDB. NOT for: gene-level differential expression…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
cerna-analysis
Use when building a ceRNA regulatory network from a key gene list by combining bundled miRNA-mRNA and miRNA-lncRNA database files, with flat-file CSV exports and PDF visualization in a single output directory. NOT for: differential expression, single-cell analysis, enrichment analysis, or workflows without a key gene…
cibersort-immune-infiltration-analysis
Use when estimating relative immune cell infiltration from a bulk expression matrix with a CIBERSORT-style nu-SVR deconvolution workflow based on an LM22 signature matrix, comparing one case group against one control group, and generating structured tables plus immune-fraction plots. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq…
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…