Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill poisson-test-statistical-scoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/poisson-test-statistical-scoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/poisson-test-statistical-scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/poisson-test-statistical-scoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/poisson-test-statistical-scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/poisson-test-statistical-scoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00810 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
poisson-test-statistical-scoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Poisson Test Statistical Scoring
Summary
Apply Poisson or quasi-Poisson statistical models to compare ChIP-Seq signal against local background noise, generating p-value or q-value scores for each genomic position. This skill transforms raw coverage comparisons into statistical significance estimates suitable for peak calling.
When to use
After generating ChIP pileup and local lambda (background) BEDGRAPH tracks with matched sequencing depth, use this skill to assign statistical significance scores to each genomic region. Specifically, when you have comparable ChIP and control coverage tracks and need to identify enriched regions above baseline noise — typical in narrow peak calling workflows where a single comparison model (qpois or ppois) must be applied genome-wide.
When NOT to use
- Input backgrounds are not normalized to the same sequencing depth as ChIP — local lambda must be scaled by the ratio (final_ChIP_reads / control_reads) before comparison.
- ChIP and control samples have vastly different library sizes without depth normalization; the statistical model assumes comparable sequencing effort.
- Local background was not properly constructed from d, slocal (1kb), and llocal (10kb) windows; misspecified background invalidates the significance test.
Inputs
- ChIP pileup BEDGRAPH (coverage track extended to fragment length d)
- Local lambda background BEDGRAPH (scaled to ChIP sequencing depth, combining d/slocal/llocal maximum with genome background)
Outputs
- q-value BEDGRAPH (log10-transformed quasi-Poisson scores, base-pair resolution)
- p-value BEDGRAPH (log10-transformed Poisson scores, base-pair resolution)
How to apply
Use macs3 bdgcmp with the -m qpois flag to apply a quasi-Poisson test comparing ChIP pileup BEDGRAPH against the scaled local lambda background BEDGRAPH. The quasi-Poisson model accounts for overdispersion in read counts and outputs a q-value BEDGRAPH; alternatively, use -m ppois for p-value scoring if Poisson assumptions hold more strictly. The resulting score track contains log10-transformed statistical significance at base-pair resolution. Choose qpois (default, more robust) when read count variance exceeds the mean; choose ppois when variance equals mean. The output BEDGRAPH is then thresholded using macs3 bdgpeakcall with a cutoff (e.g., -c 1.301 for q-value ≤ 0.05) to call peaks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 96 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 4533f37dc302
poisson-test-statistical-scoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,620 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsva-analysis-and-visualization
Use this skill to run GSVA or ssGSEA pathway-level differential analysis from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, then generate a heatmap from the saved GSVA result object. Trigger keywords: GSVA, ssGSEA, pathway enrichment, KEGG pathway analysis, MSigDB. NOT for: gene-level differential expression…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…