Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill sparse-matrix-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/sparse-matrix-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/sparse-matrix-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/sparse-matrix-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/sparse-matrix-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/sparse-matrix-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00749 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
sparse-matrix-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
sparse-matrix-validation
Summary
Validation of sparse count matrices generated from single-cell ATAC-seq fragment data to ensure matrix shape, sparsity structure, and quantitative correctness before downstream analysis. This skill verifies that tile-based or peak-based count matrices possess expected dimensions, contain appropriately distributed non-zero entries across cells and genomic features, and reflect genuine chromatin accessibility signal.
When to use
After generating a count matrix from fragment data using pp.add_tile_matrix, pp.make_peak_matrix, or pp.make_gene_matrix in SnapATAC2. Validation is essential whenever you transition from fragment-level preprocessing to matrix-based analysis (dimension reduction, clustering, peak calling) to detect generation errors, parameter misconfigurations, or data corruption that would propagate through the pipeline.
When NOT to use
- Input is already a validated feature table (e.g., pre-computed matrix from a completed SnapATAC2 workflow); re-validation is redundant.
- Fragment file has not yet been imported into AnnData; validate fragment import separately before matrix generation.
- You are performing quality control on raw sequencing reads prior to alignment; use fragment-level QC (e.g., mapping rate, duplicate removal) instead.
Inputs
- AnnData object with .obsm['fragment_paired'] or .obsm['fragment_single'] containing aligned fragment data
- Tile coordinate definitions or peak BED file used for matrix generation
- Matrix generation parameters (counting strategy, bin size or peak coordinates)
Outputs
- Validated sparse count matrix (n_obs × n_vars) stored in .X or .obsm
- Summary statistics: matrix dimensions, sparsity fraction, entry value range, non-zero count distribution across cells and features
How to apply
Inspect the resulting matrix object for three key invariants: (1) verify matrix shape (n_obs × n_vars) matches the number of cells (observations) and genomic tiles or peaks (variables) as defined by your binning or peak-calling parameters; (2) confirm the matrix contains non-zero entries distributed across both cells and genomic features, indicating signal is not concentrated in a pathological subset; (3) validate sparsity is appropriate for ATAC-seq (typically 85–99% sparse depending on sequencing depth and genome resolution), and that entry values are counts (non-negative integers). These checks catch mismatches between fragment input and matrix construction parameters (e.g., wrong genome build, misaligned tile coordinates, or empty fragment sets).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 96 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b62855601692
sparse-matrix-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,499 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-model-validation
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis…
gsva-analysis-and-visualization
Use this skill to run GSVA or ssGSEA pathway-level differential analysis from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, then generate a heatmap from the saved GSVA result object. Trigger keywords: GSVA, ssGSEA, pathway enrichment, KEGG pathway analysis, MSigDB. NOT for: gene-level differential expression…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…