Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add merlinhu1/codex-game-studio --skill cgs-standards-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/merlinhu1/codex-game-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/merlinhu1/codex-game-studio/cgs-standards-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/merlinhu1/codex-game-studio/cgs-standards-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/merlinhu1/codex-game-studio/cgs-standards-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/merlinhu1/codex-game-studio/cgs-standards-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/merlinhu1/codex-game-studio/cgs-standards-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00486 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00243 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
cgs-standards-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codex Game Studio Test Standards
Use this skill for test standards work in Template Game.
Objective
unit, integration, engine smoke, playtest, and regression coverage
Inputs
- AGENTS.md
- .codex/studio.json
- task-relevant source, tests, docs, or assets
Arguments
- Objective or user request.
- Target files, scenes, assets, or docs.
- Constraints, deadlines, acceptance criteria, and verification command when known.
Procedure
- Read the requested files and identify the test standards rule being applied.
- Check unit, integration, engine smoke, playtest, and regression coverage.
- Report violations with file paths, impact, and the smallest safe fix.
Output Contract
- Rule applied
- Files checked
- Violations
- Verification
Quality Gates
- Narrow Test
- Suite
- Evidence
- Scope remains bounded to the current task and project stage.
- Report labels unverified assumptions separately from evidence.
Decision Gates
- Continue only when the expected output can be verified or clearly labeled as a plan.
- Escalate to producer or qa-playtester when scope, ownership, or acceptance evidence is ambiguous.
- Stop before broad rewrites, generated prompt mirrors, or hidden lifecycle behavior.
Handoff
Report changed files, verification evidence, remaining risks, and the next owner or decision. Do not imply hidden hooks or autonomous background work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 65 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 42fb3ed207d0
cgs-standards-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository merlinhu1/codex-game-studio (54 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 486 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
smoke-check
Run the critical path smoke test gate before QA hand-off. Executes the automated test suite, verifies core functionality, and produces a PASS/FAIL report. Run after a sprint's stories are implemented and before manual QA begins. A failed smoke check means the build is not ready for QA.
qa-plan
Generate a QA test plan for a sprint or feature. Reads GDDs and story files, classifies stories by test type (Logic/Integration/Visual/UI), and produces a structured test plan covering automated tests required, manual test cases, smoke test scope, and playtest sign-off requirements. Run before sprint begins or when…
automated-smoke-test
Run an automated smoke test using the godot-mcp server. Launches the project, captures debug output, and checks for errors or crashes.
godot-testing-qa
Domain skill — Run a sequence of runtime actions and assertions. Assert runtime node existence and properties. Assert visible runtime text. Compare two PNGs using bounded pixel sampling. Sample runtime performance for a bounded frame count. Return the latest runtime test report.
team-combat
Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.
team-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.