What is review-tower?

A browser-based code review game that represents a pull request, a proposed code change for review, as a tower with floors. It offers independent Challenge mode and AI-guided Scout mode, with game-style scores and progression.

Use it to inspect changed files, group them into review sections, and present review findings in an interactive browser page.

It gives code review a visible structure and keeps review results, scoring, and progress together. It can review a pull request from a URL, number, or the current branch.

review-tower — Skill for Claude Code by mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins --skill review-tower

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install gamified-code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins/review-tower.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,943 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00073	$0.01943
Opus 5.5	$0.00029	$0.00777
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00015	$0.00389
Haiku 4.5	$0.00007	$0.00194

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 9231fa5d24f5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-tower scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/gamified-code-review/skills/review-tower/SKILL.md · 187 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Tower

Generate a browser-based gamified code review for a pull request. You are the AI reviewer — analyze the code, package your findings as JSON, inject into an HTML template, and open the result in the browser. The template handles scoring, progression, and stats persistence at runtime; your job ends after opening the HTML.

References (in ./references/):

scoring-tables.md — severity criteria, multiplier values, XP formulas
rpg-progression.md — tier thresholds, titles, badges, stats schema
finding-matching-guide.md — how reviewer findings match AI findings

1. Input

Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine input type:

PR reference (URL, number, or empty for current branch): proceed to step 2.
JSON comments array (pasted export from Review Tower): skip to step 7 (Post Findings to PR).

If gh is not installed, tell the user: brew install gh && gh auth login.

2. Fetch PR Data

Retrieve the PR metadata and full unified diff needed to populate the JSON schema below. If no PR found, ask for a number/URL. If the diff is empty, inform the user and stop.

3. Construct Tower

Group Files into Floors

Same directory/module → same floor
Test files (.test., .spec., __tests__/) → group with their implementation files
Type/interface files → group with implementations
Config files (package.json, .env*, CI configs, tsconfig, .eslintrc) → dedicated Easy floor
Cap at 10 floors (template UI constraint); merge by parent directory if needed
Single-file floors are fine; don't force-merge unrelated files

Assign Difficulty

A "concern" is a distinct logical change area (e.g., "refactoring auth middleware" and "adding rate limiting" are 2 concerns).

Per floor, total lines changed across its files:

Easy: < 50 lines AND single concern
Normal: 50-200 lines, OR 2+ concerns
Boss: > 200 lines, OR security-sensitive paths (auth, payments, data migrations, public API contracts, DB schemas)

If tower has 3+ floors, ensure at least 1 Boss. Promote the floor with the most lines changed among non-Boss floors.

Read the full file on GitHub · 187 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 9231fa5d24f5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-tower is a skill published in the GitHub repository mocraimer/mo-cc-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,943 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code review Game development

review-tower next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
review-towermocraimer/mo-cc-plugins	Skill	2	7mo ago	MIT	A	73	Claude Code
godot-code-reviewjame581/GodotPrompter	Skill	933	6d ago	MIT	A	67	Claude Code
animation-reviewvalkor-ai/loom	Skill	1.4k	4d ago	Apache-2.0	A	75	Claude Code, Codex
tilemap-reviewvalkor-ai/loom	Skill	1.4k	4d ago	Apache-2.0	A	85	Claude Code, Codex
code-reviewstriderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios	Skill	114	2d ago	MIT	A	41	Claude Code
hz-unity-code-reviewmeta-quest/agentic-tools	Skill	246	1mo ago	Apache-2.0	A	43	Claude Code
unity-reviewerTheArcForge/Hades	Skill	28	4d ago	MIT	A	39	Claude Code