claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill oracle-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00911 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
oracle-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Oracle review — an independent referee, then an honest triage
Never launch a bare Oracle run. This skill is the driver; the mechanics and the full
contract live in external-oracle-process.md.
Read it before the first run in a project — it carries setup, flags, artifact layout, the
payload cliff, and the failure modes that have actually cost runs.
Compose with /credible-claims (the brief before, the claim
record after) and /deep-audit (exhaustive in-house coverage first,
so the oracle is confirmation, not discovery).
1. Brief before launch (5 lines)
- Question — what must this review answer? (correctness audit? venue-referee simulation? confirm N named fixes cleared?)
- Scope — what is IN, and what is HELD (standing rulings; list them so triage can filter).
- Completion — what verdict or evidence ends this run.
- Required evidence — findings carry location + failing case, or they do not count.
- Escalation — which finding types come back to the user before any fix: estimand changes, assumption concessions, reporting-language downgrades.
2. Assign coverage — never let the referee sample
Maintain a statement inventory and a cross-round coverage ledger. Each round assigns what to audit and requires the referee to report what it actually verified, so union coverage reaches 100% instead of drifting toward whatever is easiest to read.
3. Launch
Mechanics, flags, and gotchas: the reference, §2–§3. Smoke-test first; check --files-report
against the payload cliff; a run with no conversation URL never happened.
4. Triage — adjudicate, never ingest
Every finding is a CANDIDATE. Hand the batch to
/adjudicate-review: judge each against the actual text,
compute the computable first, filter the HELD list, and assign
CONFIRMED / REFUTED / DOWNGRADED.
Oracle agreeing with your own reading is not independent confirmation — different models correlate on the same wrong answer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 66 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5200f8d0f719
oracle-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,569 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 911 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fin-paper-figure
Generate academic-quality figures (>=300 DPI) for economics and finance papers.
fin-paper-writing
A workflow for turning a research outline and study design into a complete economics or finance paper. It coordinates drafting, figure creation, consistency checks, review rounds, LaTeX compilation, and submission checks.
fin-data-acquisition
A data-preparation workflow for financial research. It reads variable definitions from a completed research design and produces data-acquisition work plus executable Python or Stata regression scripts.
fin-viz-launch
A tool for turning research data and a written description into academic charts. It can choose a suitable chart type, create plotting code with matplotlib or seaborn, and save the result as a high-resolution PDF, SVG, or PNG.
fin-submit-check
A pre-submission checklist for an academic paper and its LaTeX files. It checks journal requirements such as anonymous authorship, length, spacing, margins, citations, figures, data availability, and other submission details.
fin-lit-review
A systematic literature-review workflow for economics and finance. It searches several academic sources, maps how papers cite one another, and organizes the main findings and research gaps.