claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill oracle-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/oracle-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01218 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
oracle-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Oracle review — an independent referee, then an honest triage
Never launch a bare Oracle run. This skill is the driver; the mechanics and the full
contract live in external-oracle-process.md.
Read it before the first run in a project — it carries setup, flags, artifact layout, the
payload cliff, and the failure modes that have actually cost runs.
Compose with /credible-claims (the brief before, the claim
record after) and /deep-audit (exhaustive in-house coverage first,
so the oracle is confirmation, not discovery).
1. Brief before launch (5 lines)
- Question — what must this review answer? (correctness audit? venue-referee simulation? confirm N named fixes cleared?)
- Scope — what is IN, and what is HELD (standing rulings; list them so triage can filter).
- Completion — what verdict or evidence ends this run.
- Required evidence — findings carry location + failing case, or they do not count.
- Escalation — which finding types come back to the user before any fix: estimand changes, assumption concessions, reporting-language downgrades.
2. Assign coverage — never let the referee sample
Maintain a statement inventory and a cross-round coverage ledger. Each round assigns what to audit and requires the referee to report what it actually verified, so union coverage reaches 100% instead of drifting toward whatever is easiest to read.
3. Launch
Nothing restricted leaves the machine. A consult uploads every attached file to another
vendor. Before launch, check the file list against
confidential-data.md: no restricted microdata, no
cell-level outputs that have not cleared /disclosure-check, no credentials. Your own manuscripts,
proofs, and code are what a consult is for — send them. A manuscript or proposal you are reviewing is
not yours to send: it is held in confidence. Many journals tell reviewers not to put a submission
into AI tools, and NIH forbids its peer reviewers from uploading any part of an application,
proposal or critique to one (NOT-OD-23-149). When a file mixes your own paper
with restricted material, send the paper without the restricted part; a submission you are
reviewing stays unsendable even after redaction.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +17 lines 56f5acddf6c6
- 2mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5200f8d0f719
oracle-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,701 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,218 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
oracle-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oracle-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow | Skill | 1.7k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| fin-paper-figurecsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code, Codex |
| fin-paper-writingcsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| fin-viz-launchcsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code, Codex |
| fin-data-acquisitioncsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code, Codex |
| fin-lit-reviewcsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| fin-submit-checkcsmar432/finai-research | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |