Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4S --skill bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4SWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00154 | $0.09450 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.04725 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01890 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00945 |
Grade A, and why
bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 421 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: TwoSampleMR 0.6.0+, MendelianRandomization 0.10+, MR-PRESSO 1.0+, cause 1.2+, MVMR 0.4+, ieugwasr 1.0+, MRlap 0.0.3.2+, coloc 5.2+, mrclust 0.1+, lhcMR 0.0.1+, R 4.4+. Both TwoSampleMR 0.6.0 and ieugwasr 1.0 are the JWT-transition versions; older versions still expect deprecated OAuth.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- R:
packageVersion('<pkg>')then?function_nameto verify parameters - CLI (plink, GCTA-GSMR):
<tool> --versionthen<tool> --help
If code throws an error referencing a function that has moved (e.g. ieugwasr::ld_clump vs TwoSampleMR::clump_data) or an OAuth token failure, introspect the installed API and adapt the example rather than retrying.
Mendelian Randomization
"Test whether trait X causally affects trait Y from GWAS summary statistics" -> Use genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) that satisfy three assumptions (relevance, independence, exclusion restriction) to estimate beta_causal = beta_outcome / beta_exposure under the IV framework (Davey Smith & Ebrahim 2003 IJE 32:1; Burgess & Thompson 2021 Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2nd ed.). Tool choice is a decision about the regime (one-sample vs two-sample, sparse vs polygenic, drug-target vs polygenic exposure) and the pleiotropy model (balanced, directional InSIDE, correlated horizontal). Wrong tool inflates Type-I error or attenuates true effects in a direction predictable from the bias structure.
- R:
TwoSampleMR::mr()orchestrates IVW + Egger + weighted median + weighted mode in one call - R:
MendelianRandomization::mr_ivw / mr_egger / mr_median / mr_mbe / mr_conmixper-method API (S4 objects; MR-RAPS is NOT in this package -- useTwoSampleMR::mr_raps()which wraps the GitHubmr.raps) - R:
MRPRESSO::mr_presso()global / outlier / distortion tests - R:
cause::cause()correlated horizontal pleiotropy mixture - R:
MVMR::strength_mvmr() + MVMR::ivw_mvmr()multivariable conditional-F + IVW
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 421 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A 4e771465992d
bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization is a skill published in the GitHub repository PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4S (407 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 9,450 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bio-causal-genomics-mendelian-randomization, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
boltz-structure-prediction
Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 structure prediction for proteins, complexes, and ligand-aware validation. Use this skill when: (1) Predicting protein complex structures, (2) Validating designed binders, (3) Need open-source alternative to AF2, (4) Predicting protein-ligand complexes, (5) Using local GPU resources. For QC…
imaging-data-commons
Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons using idc-index. Use for accessing large-scale radiology (CT, MR, PET) and pathology datasets for AI training or research. No authentication required. Query by metadata, visualize in browser, check licenses.
flow-cytometry-analysis
Complete flow cytometry analysis pipeline. FCS file handling, compensation, manual/automated gating, immunophenotyping, CFSE proliferation analysis, cell cycle analysis (Dean-Jett-Fox), and apoptosis assays. Extends flowio with analytical workflows. For raw FCS parsing only use flowio.
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review…
cellxgene-census
Query the CELLxGENE Census (61M+ cells) programmatically. Use when you need expression data across tissues, diseases, or cell types from the largest curated single-cell atlas. Best for population-scale queries, reference atlas comparisons. For analyzing your own data use scanpy or scvi-tools.
glycobiology
Glycosylation site prediction and glycobiology analysis. N-glycosylation motif finding, O-glycosylation hotspot prediction, glycan structure resources. Lightweight, pure Python. For protein function queries use uniprot-database; for structure analysis use alphafold-database.