Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4S --skill bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4SWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pku-yuangroup/openai4s/bio-chemoinformatics-ml-docking-rescoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04228 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02114 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00846 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00423 |
Grade A, and why
bio-ml-docking-rescoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to bio-ml-docking-rescoring — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: DiffDock-L (Corso et al. 2024), Boltz-1 1.0+, Boltz-2 (Passaro et al. 2025), Chai-1 0.4+, AlphaFold 3 (DeepMind), EquiBind, TANKBind, GNINA 1.1+, and PoseBusters 0.6+.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python:
pip show <package>thenhelp(module.function)to check signatures - CLI:
diffdock --version;boltz --version
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
ML Docking and Rescoring
Use machine-learning models for protein-ligand pose prediction and affinity scoring. Foundation models such as AlphaFold 3, Boltz, and Chai-1 handle protein-ligand complex prediction, while DiffDock-L extends the original DiffDock method for ligand-pose sampling (Corso et al. 2023, 2024). Boltz-2 reports affinity prediction approaching physics-based free-energy methods on its evaluated benchmarks at substantially lower computational cost. Physical plausibility remains a separate requirement: on the PoseBusters Benchmark, the original DiffDock produced a correct and physically valid pose for 12% of complexes, compared with 58% for Vina and 55% for GOLD (Buttenschoen et al. 2024). Use ML sampling with independent scoring and physical validation rather than treating model confidence as sufficient.
For classical docking, see chemoinformatics/virtual-screening. For pose validation (PoseBusters), see chemoinformatics/pose-validation. For free-energy calculations (post-docking), see chemoinformatics/free-energy-calculations. For PROTAC ternary complex prediction, see chemoinformatics/protac-degraders.
ML Docking Method Taxonomy
| Tool | Approach | Speed | Strength | Fails when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffDock-L (Corso et al. 2024) | Equivariant diffusion | GPU; hardware-dependent | Diverse pose sampling for cross-docking | Requires physical validation; OOD risk |
| Boltz-1 (Wohlwend et al. 2024) | AlphaFold-style foundation | GPU; hardware-dependent | Full complex prediction | Confidence is not affinity or physical validation |
| Boltz-2 (Passaro et al. 2025) | Boltz-1 + affinity module | GPU; hardware-dependent | Joint pose and affinity triage | Benchmark- and chemotype-dependent accuracy |
| Chai-1 (Chai Discovery 2024) | AlphaFold-style + language model | GPU; hardware-dependent | Open-weight complex prediction | Validate ligands and cofactors independently |
| AlphaFold 3 (Abramson et al. 2024) | Foundation model | Local code/weights or public server | Complex prediction with proteins and ligands | Server and local distributions have different terms and limits |
| EquiBind | Equivariant single-shot | <1s GPU | Fast pose | Lowest accuracy on PoseBusters |
| TANKBind | Distance + classifier | <1s GPU | Fast pose + score | Geometric inconsistency |
| NeuralPLexer | E3-equivariant generative model | GPU; hardware-dependent | Protein-ligand structure prediction | Validate geometry and confidence on the target domain |
| Glide (Schrödinger) | Grid-based docking and empirical scoring | License and hardware-dependent | Commercial docking workflow | License cost |
| GNINA 1.1 CNN | Classical sampling + CNN scoring | GPU; hardware-dependent | CNN-assisted pose ranking | Validate transfer to the target and chemotype |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 285 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 79905b35c77f
bio-ml-docking-rescoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository PKU-YuanGroup/OpenAI4S (407 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,228 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to bio-ml-docking-rescoring, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
histolab
Lightweight WSI tile extraction and preprocessing. Use for basic slide processing tissue detection, tile extraction, stain normalization for H&E images. Best for simple pipelines, dataset preparation, quick tile-based analysis. For advanced spatial proteomics, multiplexed imaging, or deep learning pipelines use pathml.
pyhealth
Comprehensive healthcare AI toolkit for developing, testing, and deploying machine learning models with clinical data. This skill should be used when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC)…
deepchem
Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For graph-first…
torch-geometric
Graph Neural Networks (PyG). Node/graph classification, link prediction, GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, heterogeneous graphs, molecular property prediction, for geometric deep learning.
zarr-python
Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I/O, S3/GCS integration, NumPy/Dask/Xarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.
alphafold-database
Access AlphaFold 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.