Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/skills/source-driven-development/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/source-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/source-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/source-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/source-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/source-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 174 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01731 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00865 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
source-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
- source-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source-Driven Development
Overview
Every framework-specific code decision must be backed by official documentation. Don't implement from memory — verify, cite, and let the user see your sources. Training data goes stale, APIs get deprecated, best practices evolve. This skill ensures the user gets code they can trust because every pattern traces back to an authoritative source they can check.
When to Use
- The user wants code that follows current best practices for a given framework
- Building boilerplate, starter code, or patterns that will be copied across a project
- The user explicitly asks for documented, verified, or "correct" implementation
- Implementing features where the framework's recommended approach matters (forms, routing, data fetching, state management, auth)
- Reviewing or improving code that uses framework-specific patterns
- Any time you are about to write framework-specific code from memory
When NOT to use:
- Correctness does not depend on a specific version (renaming variables, fixing typos, moving files)
- Pure logic that works the same across all versions (loops, conditionals, data structures)
- The user explicitly wants speed over verification ("just do it quickly")
The Process
DETECT ──→ FETCH ──→ IMPLEMENT ──→ CITE
│ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
What Get the Follow the Show your
stack? relevant documented sources
docs patterns
Step 1: Detect Stack and Versions
Read the project's dependency file to identify exact versions:
package.json → Node/React/Vue/Angular/Svelte
composer.json → PHP/Symfony/Laravel
requirements.txt / pyproject.toml → Python/Django/Flask
go.mod → Go
Cargo.toml → Rust
Gemfile → Ruby/Rails
State what you found explicitly:
STACK DETECTED:
- React 19.1.0 (from package.json)
- Vite 6.2.0
- Tailwind CSS 4.0.3
→ Fetching official docs for the relevant patterns.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 195 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b979e7531ea6
source-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (150 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,731 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
quick-capture
Use this skill to drop a new task into GSD Task Manager from any AI assistant that has the gsd-mcp-server connected.
triage-inbox
Use this skill to walk the user through their unfiled or stale tasks and move them into the right Eisenhower quadrant.
6502-assembly
Use when writing or debugging 6502 assembly for the Commodore PET with ca65/ld65 via pet build or pet run. Covers the PET program skeleton, the BASIC SYS stub, calling ROM routines, and 6502 gotchas.
pet-development
Use when developing, running, or debugging Commodore PET software (Commodore BASIC or 6502 assembly) on the VICE emulator with the pet CLI or the pet-tools MCP server. Covers the build/run/observe/debug loop, the stopped-state discipline, PET text encodings, and per-model differences.
6502-debugging
Use when a PET program misbehaves at runtime — crashes, corruption, wrong values, dead input, visual glitches — and you need a procedure, not a guess. Symptom-indexed playbook of runtime debugging procedures using pet-tools.
resume-parser-ats
Deeply parses resume PDFs using the OpenResume 4-step algorithm, extracts structured information (Name, Email, Phone, Education, Work Experience, Skills, etc.), evaluates ATS compatibility, and provides actionable improvement suggestions. Use when a user asks to parse, review, or analyze a resume, check…