design-review

design-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios. It costs 34 tokens per session (3,031 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of design-review, MIT.

A review workflow for checking a game design document before programmers use it. It looks for missing details, contradictions, implementation problems, and departures from the project's design rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a game system specification, verify its dependencies, and identify issues that programmers may encounter.
Why use it?
It catches unclear or conflicting requirements while they are still in the design stage, reducing avoidable rework during development.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/design-review
Any agent
npx skills add striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios --skill design-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/design-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/design-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/design-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,031 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 83% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00034 $0.03031
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.01515
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00606
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00303

Measured yesterday against content hash a43746bd0211, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

83% identical to design-review — 37 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/modules/design/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · 258 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Phase 0: Parse Arguments

Extract --depth [full|lean|solo] if present. Default is full when no flag is given.

Note: --depth controls the analysis depth of this skill (how many specialist agents are spawned). It is independent of the global review mode in production/review-mode.txt, which controls director gate spawning. These are two different concepts — --depth is about how thoroughly this skill analyses the document.

  • full: Complete review — all phases + specialist agent delegation (Phase 3b)
  • lean: All phases, no specialist agents — faster, single-session analysis
  • solo: Phases 1-4 only, no delegation, no Phase 5 next-step prompt — use when called from within another skill

Phase 1: Load Documents

Read the target design document in full. Read AGENTS.md to understand project context and standards. Read related design documents referenced or implied by the target doc (check design/gdd/ for related systems).

Dependency graph validation: For every system listed in the Dependencies section, use Glob to check whether its GDD file exists in design/gdd/. Flag any that don't exist yet — these are broken references that downstream authors will hit.

Lore/narrative alignment: If design/gdd/game-concept.md or any file in design/narrative/ exists, read it. Note any mechanical choices in this GDD that contradict established world rules, tone, or design pillars. Pass this context to game-designer in Phase 3b.

Prior review check: Check whether design/gdd/reviews/[doc-name]-review-log.md exists. If it does, read the most recent entry — note what verdict was given and what blocking items were listed. This session is a re-review; track whether prior items were addressed.


Phase 2: Completeness Check

Evaluate against the Design Document Standard checklist:

  • Has Overview section (one-paragraph summary)
  • Has Player Fantasy section (intended feeling)
  • Has Detailed Rules section (unambiguous mechanics)
  • Has Formulas section (all math defined with variables)
  • Has Edge Cases section (unusual situations handled)
  • Has Dependencies section (other systems listed)
  • Has Tuning Knobs section (configurable values identified)
  • Has Acceptance Criteria section (testable success conditions)

Read the full file on GitHub · 258 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 258 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a43746bd0211

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios (83 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,031 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to design-review, differing in 37 lines, and is treated as a copy.