A handoff tool that sends the current task context to a browser session with ChatGPT Web for a deeper review and retrieves structured conclusions. It supports submitting, checking, listing, and stopping handoff jobs.
Adversarially grill CLAUDE'S OWN answer/plan/reasoning before it ships — make the reasoning explicit (explain harder), then spawn a fresh effort-escalating refute jury that KILLS by default and injects FALSE-PREMISE trap questions, looping until no new defects survive. Forces source citations on every claim…
Audits real codebases for data structure, algorithm, database, caching, scalability, reliability, and AI-system design improvements. Use when users ask to reduce time or space complexity, find hot paths, choose DSA patterns, optimize queries, improve architecture, scale a product, review infra, design RAG/agent…
Use when shipping a branch — reviewing, documenting, linting, testing, and pushing work behind a quality gate. Also use when a push is blocked by the agentic-preflight pre-push hook or when the user says agentic-preflight:uninstall to remove this tool from the current project.
Dispatch implementation and independent diff review to user-selected models through local agent CLIs. Use for /forge or explicit requests to delegate coding or review; explanation-only questions do not authorize dispatch.
Provider of the review rules guide for projects with Hexagonal architecture (Ports & Adapters, Alistair Cockburn), LANGUAGE-AGNOSTIC. Invoked by spec-init with the project's language; assembles docs/sdd/09-review-rules.md combining the hexagonal principles (dependency rule, inbound/outbound ports, adapters) with the…
Codex CLI second-opinion bridge for Claude Code. Wraps both codex exec (prompt-driven) and codex review (diff-driven) under one workflow with shared project-context preamble, filesystem boundary, JSON stream parsing, and a structured findings table. Five modes: review — custom-prompt audit of file/folder plan …
Discipline for reviewing someone else's pull request — the inverse of prod-ready (which is the author's pre-merge gate). Use when the user asks to "review this PR", "look over the diff", "check this change", "give feedback on", or invokes a code-review slash command. Reviews against the linked feature doc / ADRs /…
Systematic code review patterns covering security, performance, maintainability, correctness, and testing — with severity levels, structured feedback guidance, review process, and anti-patterns to avoid. Use when reviewing PRs, establishing review standards, or improving review quality.
After a batch of 2+ user-facing UI changes, produce a before/after verification report to sign off each change while reviewing locally. Invoke on request ('before/after report', 'verification table', 'screenshot diff') or proactively when a finished change set touches ≥2 distinct UI surfaces/behaviors. Captures…
Conduct a security-led audit of code, systems, APIs, infrastructure, dependencies, and AI workflows with threat modeling and exploitability-backed remediation. Use when security risk is the primary concern. Do not use for a generic code review, database design, or non-security debugging.
Address review comments on your own pull request: implement valid suggestions, reply to invalid ones, and resolve threads. Covers inline review threads, review body comments, and plain PR timeline comments. Use when: user says "address PR comments", "implement PR feedback", "respond to review comments", "handle review…
Apply Robert C. Martin's Clean Architecture, SOLID, and component-decoupling principles when designing, reviewing, or refactoring code — scaled correctly to the size of the task so trivial changes don't get over-engineered. Use this whenever the user asks to design a new feature/service, review code for architectural…
Solid.js best practices for AI-assisted code generation, code review, refactoring, and debugging reactivity issues. Use when working in any SolidJS project or codebase — writing components, auditing code, migrating from React, fixing signals and fine-grained reactivity bugs, or integrating web component libraries. 67…
Audits any SaaS / web application codebase for production readiness and delivers a prioritized report covering security, scalability, reliability, performance, testing, observability, data, APIs, CI/CD, infrastructure, cost, and compliance. Use when the user asks to "make my project production-grade", wants a final…
Iterative deep review using 14-lens methodology. Use when reviewing ANY plan, code review, architecture doc, test plan, or security assessment, before claiming it is complete. Runs fourteen lenses from different analysis angles and repeats the full set until a whole pass finds nothing new. Each lens catches issues…
Audit installed Claude skills for quality and surface Keep/Improve/Update/Retire/Merge verdicts. Use when the user says "audit my skills", "stocktake", "review my skills", "which skills should I retire or merge", "do a quality pass over my skills", or "/skill-stocktake". NOT for creating or improving a single skill…
Fix a bug with xReview peer review. Codex is the developer, a peer LLM agent reviews your work. Use when: /bugfix, fix a bug with review.
★not rated 2 2mo agoA40 tokens
originalMIT
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: