Use when the user wants to add, modify, debug, or review an xLLM TileLang Ascend kernel or specialization, including Python kernel definitions, generated Ascend-C source, runtime wrapper dispatch, TileLang CMake wiring, and NPU tests.
Reviews an ADK integration documentation page (a Markdown file under docs/integrations/) or an integration pull request for correctness, structure, style, working code, valid links, and catalog conventions. Produces a prioritized review report, a recommended decision (approve, request changes, or close PR), a…
Manage LiveReview code review for staged changes in this repo. Run /lrc review to open a browser-based AI review of staged changes before committing. Use /lrc skip to bypass review and write an attestation, or /lrc vouch to manually approve without AI. Check and toggle hook state with /lrc hooks status, hooks disable…
Review uncommitted code changes using parallel Claude sub-agents (Bug Hunter, Rules Auditor, optional Architect). The invoking agent triages the diff by file path into impacted modules and risk surfaces, then spawns reviewers scaled to the change. Each reviewer self-primes via /prime, verifies any API/library claim…
Open Codiff for a narrative code walkthrough, a blocking plan handoff, or a shared walkthrough URL. Use when the user writes "$codiff", "/codiff", "$codiff plan", "$codiff share", "show me codiff", "open Codiff", or asks to review a change or edit a plan in Codiff.
Review a change to Jupyter MCP Server. Use when reviewing a pull request or a diff in this repository — it covers the failure modes this codebase actually produces, the contracts that hold the docs and the protocol to the code, and the result-shape rules a new tool has to follow.
Independent, multi-model review of a design or spec before any code is written, for the microsoft/winappcli repo. Activate when a contributor asks to "review this spec", "review my design", "review this design doc", "validate this approach", "should we build this", "spec review", "design review", or "feature review".…
Performs scrutinizing code reviews against project standards (e.g., GEMINI.md) and design docs. Intelligently detects relevant design files, categorizes findings (Safety, Complexity, Style), and generates actionable diffs. Use when the user asks to review a PR, diff, or specific codebase components.
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
A guide for collaborating on code with Git and GitHub. Git tracks changes locally, while GitHub hosts repositories and supports pull requests, reviews, and team workflows.
Find and remove AI slop — the generic, machine-default visual and copy tics of vibe-coded products — from a web project. Use when the user asks to "kill AI slop", "de-slop", "remove the AI look", "make this not look AI-generated", or clean up a landing page / UI / docs that feels templated. Detects and fixes the…
Review code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.
Perform a structured maintainer-style PR review for the mariadb-operator repository. Gathers PR context, triages the change, and evaluates correctness, safety, pitfalls, backwards compatibility and code quality against the project conventions documented in AGENTS.md. Use whenever the user mentions a mariadb-operator…
Simplicity gate for ALL code written, fixed, or reviewed in this repo. Invoke BEFORE writing any code change and when reviewing any diff. Treats over-complex or oversized code as a correctness bug, not a style issue.
Use when an agent needs to author or reply to crit inline comments programmatically (including multi-agent workflows commenting on shared code/plans/docs/proposals), publish or unpublish a crit review with crit share, sync a crit review to or from a GitHub PR or GitLab MR, or read/interpret a crit review JSON file.…
Write GitHub PR comments in Jack's voice. Use whenever writing, drafting, or posting PR comments — review feedback, thank-you notes, merge comments, close explanations, or change requests. Also use when the user asks to "comment on PR", "review PR", "thank contributor", "close PR", or "write PR feedback". Always use…
Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's…
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: