Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add woliveiras/geremmyas --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/woliveiras/geremmyasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00680 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD
Use one behavior as the unit of progress. Run when the feature is Ready: its
spec, plan, tasks, acceptance criteria, and test strategy pass the repository's
machine-readable readiness checks. Human approval is not a feature gate.
Process
- Read
spec.md,plan.md, andtasks.mdin the feature folder. - Pick the next task with
- [ ]or continue- [~]in progress. Mark the task- [~]when starting and- [x]when done. - Read the task's test-type (
unit,integration, orboth) and the spec's Test Strategy. If missing, decide using the same rules as test generation reference. - Write one test that verifies observable behavior through the appropriate boundary (unit: public API of a module; integration: cross-module or I/O).
- Run the test and confirm it fails for the expected reason.
- Implement the minimum production code to pass that test.
- Run the focused test and the nearest relevant suite.
- Repeat for the next behavior or task.
- Refactor only when tests are green; rerun tests after each refactor.
- Use the lifecycle
Draft->Ready->In Progress->Verified. SetIn Progresswhen implementation begins. - Before
Verifiedor any handoff, mark every finished task[x], clear stale[~], reconcile required docs and plan items, and obtain independent review with no actionable finding. - Set
Verifiedinspec.mdand updatespecs/README.mdonly when every acceptance criterion has fresh evidence and step 11 is complete. Merge, commit, push, and deployment are separate authority dimensions and do not change feature lifecycle state.
Rules
- Do not write all tests first and then all implementation.
- Do not test private functions, call order, or internal collaborators.
- Mock only system boundaries (network, time, filesystem, external services).
- If a test appears wrong, revisit the spec before changing the test.
- When the user only wants tests from acceptance criteria without implementation, follow test generation.
- When progress becomes circular or scope changes materially, follow abort criteria.
- Escalate to the user only for unresolved material product ambiguity, or when blast radius is high and at least one evidence gap remains: rollback is unproven, or critical harness evidence is missing. Otherwise document the decision, use specialist review when useful, and continue through the executable gates.
- Update
tasks.mdcheckboxes as each task starts ([~]) and finishes ([x]). Stale checkboxes block reliable resumption fromspecs/README.mdand the feature folder.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 56 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 80a7690644ac
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository woliveiras/geremmyas (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 680 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.