Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ownego/token-slayer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ownego/token-slayer/master/.claude/agents/battlefield-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ownego/token-slayerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ownego/token-slayer/battlefield-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ownego/token-slayer/battlefield-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ownego/token-slayer/battlefield-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ownego/token-slayer/battlefield-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ownego/token-slayer/battlefield-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01016 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
battlefield-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 51 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 97b3db72f944
battlefield-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ownego/token-slayer (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,016 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
spritekit-auditor
Use this agent when the user wants to audit SpriteKit game code for common issues. Automatically scans for physics bitmask problems, draw call waste, node accumulation, action memory leaks, coordinate confusion, touch handling bugs, missing object pooling, and missing debug overlays. user: "Can you check my SpriteKit…
lead-programmer
The Lead Programmer owns code-level architecture, coding standards, code review, and the assignment of programming work to specialist programmers. Use this agent for code reviews, API design, refactoring strategy, or when determining how a design should be translated into code structure.
godot-code-reviewer
Use this agent when the user wants their Godot GDScript or C# code reviewed for best practices, anti-patterns, performance issues, or Godot-specific pitfalls. Also use when completing a major feature and wanting a quality check. Examples: Context: User wants a code review. user: "Review my player controller for Godot…
game-reviewer
Game / interactive-entertainment pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off age-rating + COPPA decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
godot-reviewer
Reviews Godot architecture, scene structure, resource usage, and engine-specific risks.
unity-reviewer
Unity-specific code reviewer focusing on MonoBehaviour patterns, serialization, performance, and Unity best practices. Use after implementing Unity code to catch Unity-specific issues.