Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/randallliuxin/godotmaker/verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RandallLiuXin/GodotMakerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/randallliuxin/godotmaker/verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/randallliuxin/godotmaker/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/randallliuxin/godotmaker/verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00634 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 151 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A af6c0a73b8df
verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository RandallLiuXin/GodotMaker (532 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,268 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-flow
FLOW framework prompt analyst. Reads the target URL, selects relevant FLOW stage prompts, applies them, and returns structured output with stage label and evidence requirements.
seo-local
Local SEO specialist. Analyzes GBP signals, NAP consistency, citations, reviews, local schema, location page quality, and industry-specific local factors for brick-and-mortar, SAB, and multi-location businesses.
audit-creative
Cross-platform creative specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering creative fit, concept diversity, fatigue, format coverage, message match, and evidence-backed refresh recommendations.
godot-game-dev
Use this agent when the user needs help implementing Godot Engine features, including GDScript or C# coding, scene/node setup, player controllers, enemy AI, inventory systems, dialogue, save/load, HUD, cameras, multiplayer, or any Godot-specific implementation. Examples: Context: User needs to implement enemy AI.…
backend_dev
专业后端开发工程师，负责API设计、数据库优化和服务器端逻辑开发.
problem-explorer
Deepens understanding of extracted problems by discovering sub-problems, implied problems, ambiguities, contradictions, and factors — producing enriched problem definitions that support reliable decomposition.