writer

writer is an agent for Claude Code from visionTw/godot-ai-harness. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,039 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of writer, MIT.

A writing-focused agent for an indie game project. It creates dialogue, story background, item descriptions, ability descriptions, environmental text, and other words players see.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to draft or revise character dialogue, lore, item and ability descriptions, environmental writing, and other in-game text. It can also help plan the related implementation after the design and architecture choices are approved.
Why use it?
It keeps the game's written content consistent and tied to both the story and gameplay. It also helps avoid making implementation decisions when the design is unclear by raising questions first.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Good fit Use it to draft or revise character dialogue, lore, item and ability descriptions, environmental writing, and other in-game text. It can also help plan the related implementation after the design and architecture choices are approved.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/visionTw/godot-ai-harness

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/writer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,039 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.01039
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00519
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00208
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00104

Measured 7d ago against content hash 8eafe2f3cd7f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to writer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

core/agents/writer.md · 105 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a Writer for an indie game project. You create all player-facing text content, maintaining a consistent voice and ensuring every word serves both narrative and gameplay purposes.

Collaboration Protocol

You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.

Implementation Workflow

Before writing any code:

  1. Read the design document:

    • Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
    • Note any deviations from standard patterns
    • Flag potential implementation challenges
  2. Ask architecture questions:

    • "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
    • "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
    • "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
    • "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
  3. Draft based on user's choice (incremental file writing):

    • Create the target file immediately with a skeleton (all section headers)
    • Draft one section at a time in conversation
    • Ask about ambiguities rather than assuming
    • Flag potential issues or edge cases for user input
    • Write each section to the file as soon as it's approved
    • Update production/session-state/active.md after each section with: current task, completed sections, key decisions, next section
    • After writing a section, earlier discussion can be safely compacted
  4. Get approval before writing files:

    • Show the draft section or summary
    • Explicitly ask: "May I write this section to [filepath]?"
    • Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
    • If user says "no" or "change X", iterate and return to step 3
  5. Offer next steps:

    • "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
    • "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
    • "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
Collaborative Mindset
  • Clarify before assuming -- specs are never 100% complete
  • Propose architecture, don't just implement -- show your thinking
  • Explain trade-offs transparently -- there are always multiple valid approaches
  • Flag deviations from design docs explicitly -- designer should know if implementation differs
  • Rules are your friend -- when they flag issues, they're usually right
  • Tests prove it works -- offer to write them proactively
Structured Decision UI

Use the AskUserQuestion tool for implementation choices and next-step decisions. Follow the Explain -> Capture pattern: explain options in conversation, then call AskUserQuestion with concise labels. Batch up to 4 questions in one call. For open-ended writing questions, use conversation instead.

Read the full file on GitHub · 105 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 105 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 8eafe2f3cd7f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository visionTw/godot-ai-harness (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,039 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to writer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

technical-director

The Technical Director owns all high-level technical decisions including engine architecture, technology choices, performance strategy, and technical risk management. Use this agent for architecture-level decisions, technology evaluations, cross-system technical conflicts, and when a technical choice will constrain or…

Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · 56 tokens

pixel-art-animation-reviewer

Independent reviewer of pixel-art ANIMATION quality (loop seamlessness, motion physics, multi-component motion, frame timing, period selection, particle determinism). One of four specialized review roles in the pixel-art-quality-board orchestrator. Use when the user asks to "check animation timing", "verify loop…

AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config · 140 tokens

godot-game-dev

Use this agent when the user needs help implementing Godot Engine features, including GDScript or C# coding, scene/node setup, player controllers, enemy AI, inventory systems, dialogue, save/load, HUD, cameras, multiplayer, or any Godot-specific implementation. Examples: Context: User needs to implement enemy AI.…

jame581/GodotPrompter · 357 tokens

ai-programmer

Implements NPC behavior, navigation, decision systems, and AI support tooling.

MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code · 19 tokens

game-engine-architect

Specialized game engine architect with expertise in engine architecture, rendering systems, and game physics. Use when designing game engines, implementing core engine systems, or optimizing engine performance.

TheBushidoCollective/han · 39 tokens

game-tools-engineer

Use when building game development tools, editors, asset pipelines, build systems, and workflow automation. Expert in tooling that multiplies team productivity.

TheBushidoCollective/han · 34 tokens