Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02054 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01027 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00411 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification
Summary
Classify transcription factor binding sites as bound or unbound by analyzing the spatial distribution of Tn5 insertion depletion patterns (footprints) in ATAC-seq data. This skill leverages the characteristic nucleosome-positioning signal around protein-bound motifs to distinguish occupied from vacant regulatory sites.
When to use
You have ATAC-seq BAM files aligned to a reference genome, a set of transcription factor motif locations (BED format), and you need to determine which motifs are actually occupied by proteins in your cell type or condition. Use this skill when chromatin accessibility alone is insufficient—you require binding status labels for downstream differential binding analysis, network inference, or kinetic studies.
When NOT to use
- Input is single-cell ATAC-seq without pseudobulk aggregation by cell type or condition—individual cell resolution lacks sufficient read depth for reliable footprint detection; use the SC-Framework to generate pseudobulk BAM files first.
- Tn5 insertion bias has not been corrected—biased cutsites can mimic or obscure true footprints; apply ATACorrect before classification.
- You only have summary peak calls (BED) without aligned reads—footprint analysis requires base-pair-resolution insertion positions from BAM files.
Inputs
- ATAC-seq BAM file (aligned reads with insertion coordinates)
- Reference genome FASTA
- Transcription factor motif coordinates (BED format with motif centers)
- ATAC-seq peaks or chromatin accessibility signal (optional; for thresholding accessible sites)
Outputs
- Bound/unbound classification labels per motif site
- Footprint score matrix (insertion counts by position bin and site class)
- Aggregated insertion profiles (BED and BigWig or heatmap visualizations)
- Statistical summaries of positional insertion distributions per class
How to apply
Extract Tn5 insertion coordinates from aligned ATAC-seq reads in fixed-width windows (e.g., ±100 bp) centered on each motif site. Aggregate insertion counts per genomic position bin across all sites within each candidate class. Compute positional distribution statistics (mean, standard deviation, or normalized footprint scores) to quantify the characteristic depletion of insertions around protein-bound motifs—the 'footprint' signal that distinguishes bound from unbound sites. Sites exhibiting strong, focal depletion patterns are classified as bound; those with flat or noisy insertion profiles are classified as unbound. The classification threshold is typically determined by comparing observed insertion profiles to background distributions or by fitting score cutoffs empirically from known positive/negative controls. Visualization as aggregated insertion heatmaps or line plots confirms the expected nucleosome positioning around bound sites.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 106 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 1e9dcbe158e0
chromatin-accessibility-binding-status-classification is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,054 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsva-analysis-and-visualization
Use this skill to run GSVA or ssGSEA pathway-level differential analysis from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, then generate a heatmap from the saved GSVA result object. Trigger keywords: GSVA, ssGSEA, pathway enrichment, KEGG pathway analysis, MSigDB. NOT for: gene-level differential expression…
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…
wgcna-analysis
Use when building a weighted gene co-expression network from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, filtering variable genes by MAD, identifying co-expression modules with WGCNA, correlating modules with traits, and exporting module-level plots and gene tables. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, differential…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.