Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add inflexa-ai/inflexa --skill proteomicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/inflexa-ai/inflexaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/proteomics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/proteomics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/proteomics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/proteomics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inflexa-ai/inflexa/proteomics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.02111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01056 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
proteomics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Proteomics Analysis
Method selection and execution guidance for quantitative proteomics across mass spectrometry and affinity-based platforms.
Platform Detection and Preprocessing
Identify the platform first — each has distinct data characteristics and preprocessing requirements:
Platform?
├── DDA (Data-Dependent Acquisition)
│ ├── Input: FragPipe/MaxQuant output → protein/peptide intensity matrix
│ ├── Preprocessing:
│ │ ├── 1. Filter by missingness (keep proteins detected in >= 70% of at least one group)
│ │ ├── 2. Log2 transform intensities
│ │ ├── 3. Normalize: VSN (variance stabilizing, preferred) or median centering
│ │ ├── 4. Impute missing values:
│ │ │ ├── MNAR (Missing Not At Random, below LOD) → MinProb (left-censored)
│ │ │ ├── MAR (Missing At Random, technical dropout) → kNN
│ │ │ └── Mixed → hybrid (MinProb for low-abundance, kNN for rest)
│ │ └── 5. Assess batch effects (PCA by batch)
│ └── DE: DEP test_diff (default) or limma via rpy2
│
├── DIA (Data-Independent Acquisition)
│ ├── Input: DIA-NN output → protein/precursor intensity matrix
│ ├── Preprocessing: Same as DDA but fewer missing values expected
│ │ ├── DIA-NN already provides normalized intensities (check MaxLFQ column)
│ │ └── If raw intensities: filter → log2 → normalize → impute as above
│ └── DE: DEP test_diff or limma via rpy2
│
├── TMT / iTRAQ (Isobaric Labeling)
│ ├── Input: FragPipe/MaxQuant PSM-level or protein-level quantification
│ ├── Preprocessing:
│ │ ├── 1. MSstatsTMT dataProcess (handles plex normalization, protein summarization)
│ │ ├── 2. Channel-level normalization (reference channel, global median)
│ │ └── 3. Between-plex normalization (bridge channel if available)
│ └── DE: MSstatsTMT groupComparison (handles plex as random effect)
│
├── Olink (Proximity Extension Assay)
│ ├── Input: NPX values (already log2-scale, plate-normalized)
│ ├── Preprocessing:
│ │ ├── 1. LOD filtering: flag assays below LOD per sample
│ │ ├── 2. Multi-plate: bridge normalization using bridge samples
│ │ ├── 3. QC warnings: remove samples/assays with QC_Warning flags
│ │ └── 4. No additional normalization needed (NPX is pre-normalized)
│ └── DE: limma via rpy2 (treats NPX as log2-intensity) or linear model
│
└── SomaScan (SOMAmer Aptamer)
├── Input: ADAT file → RFU (Relative Fluorescence Units) matrix
├── Preprocessing:
│ ├── 1. ANML normalization (SomaScan standard, usually pre-applied)
│ ├── 2. Log2 transform RFU values
│ ├── 3. Filter: remove aptamers with high CV across controls
│ └── 4. Plate/batch correction if multi-plate
└── DE: limma via rpy2 on log2 RFU values
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 139 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A b8852f6c879b
proteomics is a skill published in the GitHub repository inflexa-ai/inflexa (33 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,111 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
biosymphony-structure-factory
Use when planning structural biology campaigns, binder-design triage, model comparison, structure mapping, RunPod or cloud GPU stage contracts, or Symphony or Linear task packs for long-running biological agent work.
binder-lane-round
Plan and run study-shaped protein-binder rounds with interchangeable toolchains, execution profiles, license gates, output checks, and result boundaries.
alphafold
Skill for protein structure prediction and analysis with AlphaFold. Use this skill whenever a user wants to predict or fetch a protein 3D structure, download structures from the AlphaFold Database (AFDB), run ColabFold for novel proteins, parse pLDDT confidence scores or PAE (predicted aligned error) from AlphaFold…
esm2
Skill for working with ESM2 protein language models from Meta FAIR. Use this skill whenever the user wants to generate protein embeddings or representations, score variant effects or predict mutation fitness, run contact prediction, or use ESMFold for structure prediction. Also trigger when the user mentions ESM2…
evo2
Skill for genomic sequence modeling and design with Evo2 from Arc Institute. Use this skill when a user wants to model or generate DNA sequences, score variant effects at single-nucleotide resolution, extract genomic embeddings, analyze mutations in non-coding or coding regions, design synthetic genomic elements…
rfdiffusion
Skill for de novo protein backbone generation with RFdiffusion from the Baker Lab (Institute for Protein Design). Use this skill when a user wants to design a new protein backbone from scratch, scaffold a functional motif into a new protein, design a protein binder against a target, generate symmetric oligomers…