aibridge-development-workflow

aibridge-development-workflow is a skill for Codex from liyingsong99/AIBridge. It costs 86 tokens per session (618 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A development workflow guide for projects built with Unity, a game and interactive-app engine. It routes coding, asset changes, debugging, reviews, and validation through project-specific rules and checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when changing code or Unity assets, updating project rules, investigating bugs, reviewing risk, or validating a result. It also provides workflow recipes for development and debugging tasks.
Why use it?
It helps teams follow the right development path instead of guessing which rules, tools, or checks apply. It also keeps debugging and validation tied to runtime evidence and documented decisions.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it when changing code or Unity assets, updating project rules, investigating bugs, reviewing risk, or validating a result. It also provides workflow recipes for development and debugging tasks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/liyingsong99/aibridge/aibridge-development-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add liyingsong99/AIBridge --skill aibridge-development-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liyingsong99/AIBridge

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for aibridge-development-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liyingsong99/aibridge/aibridge-development-workflow.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liyingsong99/aibridge/aibridge-development-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liyingsong99/aibridge/aibridge-development-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liyingsong99/aibridge/aibridge-development-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 86 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 618 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00086 $0.00618
Opus 5 $0.00043 $0.00309
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00124
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00062

Measured 8d ago against content hash 0016604992af, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aibridge-development-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Skill~/aibridge-development-workflow/SKILL.md · 38 lines

What it actually says

AIBridge Development Workflow

入口边界

如误入本 Skill(纯问答/解释/只读分析),直接回答,停止展开分支和 Harness 探测

必读顺序

  1. 若存在 references/project-workflow-preferences.md,先读取它
  2. 读取 references/branch-selection.md,选择启用的主分支
  3. 只读取当前分支的 references/branches/<branch>.md
  4. 进入开发、调试、审查、验证或 workflow 任务前读取 references/harness-readiness.md;只有运行时探测、resume、外部 executor、或业务命令失败需要 fallback 时,才继续读 references/harness-readiness-detail.md
  5. 仅在当前动作需要时读取:risk-gates.mdcoding-rules.mdchecklist.mddebug-investigation-workflow.mddebug-investigation-checklist.mdeditor-generation.mdprofiler-debugging.md

路由不变量

  • Skill 路由是 Preflight,不是业务模式
  • 主分支只能从 preferences 启用的分支中自动选择;用户要求禁用分支时先确认
  • 需求不清晰时先进入需求讨论分支;方案写入规则见 branches/requirements.md
  • aibridge-development-workflow 常驻;其它 Skill 仅在当前分支/phase 内有效,Mode Exit 后只保留 artifact refs 与 gate
  • Workflow report/manifest 默认作路径交接,不为常规状态读全文

工具不变量

  • 项目侧能力以 Root Rule 与 preferences 为准;勿用 $CLI harness status 做 enablement/freshness 预检
  • compile dotnet 不能替代 $CLI compile unity
  • 仅当 Root Rule / preferences 声明 Code Index 已启用且需定位 C# 声明时,才加载 aibridge-code-index
  • agent / manual step 需外部执行器或人工,并用 workflow import 回传;AIBridge CLI 不会自动执行

输出策略

输出格式与 Skill 列出策略见 branch-selection.md。最终回复不列 使用 Skills、已释放 Skills 或下一步建议 Skills;结构化续跑信息只放入 SkillHandoff

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 38 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 0016604992af

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aibridge-development-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository liyingsong99/AIBridge (218 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 618 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.