Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/security-auditnpx skills add striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios --skill security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/security-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01967 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00983 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00393 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to security-audit — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Audit
Security is not optional for any shipped game. Even single-player games have save tampering vectors. Multiplayer games have cheat surfaces, data exposure risks, and denial-of-service potential. This skill systematically audits the codebase for the most common game security failures and produces a prioritised remediation plan.
Run this skill:
- Before any public release (required for the Polish → Release gate)
- Before enabling any online/multiplayer feature
- After implementing any system that reads from disk or network
- When a security-related bug is reported
Output: production/security/security-audit-[date].md
Phase 1: Parse Arguments and Scope
Modes:
full— all categories (recommended before release)network— network/multiplayer onlysave— save file and serialization onlyinput— input validation and injection onlyquick— high-severity checks only (fastest, for iterative use)- No argument — run
full
Read docs/framework/technical-preferences.md to determine:
- Engine and language (affects which patterns to search for)
- Target platforms (affects which attack surfaces apply)
- Whether multiplayer/networking is in scope
Phase 2: Spawn Security Engineer
Spawn security-engineer via Task. Pass:
- The audit scope/mode
- Engine and language from technical preferences
- A manifest of all source directories:
src/,assets/data/, any config files
The security-engineer runs the audit across 6 categories (see Phase 3). Collect their full findings before proceeding.
Phase 3: Audit Categories
The security-engineer evaluates each of the following. Skip categories not applicable to the project scope.
Category 1: Save File and Serialization Security
- Are save files validated before loading? (no blind deserialization)
- Are save file paths constructed from user input? (path traversal risk)
- Are save files checksummed or signed? (tamper detection)
- Does the game trust numeric values from save files without bounds checking?
- Are there any eval() or dynamic code execution calls near save loading?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 245 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 3e912b17ea3a
security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios (84 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,967 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to security-audit, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
generated-raster-asset-pipeline
Define acceptance, validation, and runtime integration rules for raster assets generated with image models before they become real project content.
lighting-lod-pipeline
Define lighting policy, light budgets, LOD chains, and culling rules so 3D scenes look intentional and hit frame budgets.
2d-animation-pipeline
Define authoring, import, and state machine rules for frame-by-frame and skeletal 2D animations.
sprite-pipeline
Define import, slicing, atlas packing, and naming rules for 2D sprite assets.
ui-animation-pipeline
Define transition, feedback, and state-driven animation rules for UI elements.
tilemap-pipeline
Define tileset creation, auto-tile rules, collision shapes, and tilemap configuration for 2D levels.