Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/sprint-plannpx skills add striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios --skill sprint-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/sprint-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/sprint-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/striderza/opencodegamestudios/sprint-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.02038 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01019 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
sprint-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to sprint-plan — 75 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase 0: Parse Arguments
Extract the mode argument (new, update, or status) and resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
See docs/framework/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
Phase 1: Gather Context
-
Read the current milestone from
production/milestones/. -
Read the previous sprint (if any) from
production/sprints/to understand velocity and carryover. -
Scan design documents in
design/gdd/for features tagged as ready for implementation. -
Check the risk register at
production/risk-register/.
Phase 2: Generate Output
For new:
Generate a sprint plan following this format and present it to the user. Do NOT ask to write yet — the producer feasibility gate (Phase 4) runs first and may require revisions before the file is written.
# Sprint [N] -- [Start Date] to [End Date]
## Sprint Goal
[One sentence describing what this sprint achieves toward the milestone]
## Capacity
- Total days: [X]
- Buffer (20%): [Y days reserved for unplanned work]
- Available: [Z days]
## Tasks
### Must Have (Critical Path)
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
### Should Have
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
### Nice to Have
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
## Carryover from Previous Sprint
| Task | Reason | New Estimate |
|------|--------|-------------|
## Risks
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
## Dependencies on External Factors
- [List any external dependencies]
## Definition of Done for this Sprint
- [ ] All Must Have tasks completed
- [ ] All tasks pass acceptance criteria
- [ ] QA plan exists (`production/qa/qa-plan-sprint-[N].md`)
- [ ] All Logic/Integration stories have passing unit/integration tests
- [ ] Smoke check passed (`/smoke-check sprint`)
- [ ] QA sign-off report: APPROVED or APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS (`/team-qa sprint`)
- [ ] No S1 or S2 bugs in delivered features
- [ ] Design documents updated for any deviations
- [ ] Code reviewed and merged
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 229 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f6461b56cb41
sprint-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios (84 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 2,038 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to sprint-plan, differing in 75 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
generated-raster-asset-pipeline
Define acceptance, validation, and runtime integration rules for raster assets generated with image models before they become real project content.
tilemap-pipeline
Define tileset creation, auto-tile rules, collision shapes, and tilemap configuration for 2D levels.
game-feel-design
Design moment-to-moment feedback — hit-stop, screen shake, tweening, and response timing — so actions feel readable and satisfying.
level-design
Shape level flow, pacing, navigation, encounter staging, and spatial teaching.
monetization-design
Design monetization systems that fit the product, respect player trust, and remain technically and legally manageable.
combat-design
Design combat verbs, enemy pressure, resource economy, readability, and tuning hooks.