Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ZimoLiao/scholaraio. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZimoLiao/scholaraio/main/.claude/skills/citations/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZimoLiao/scholaraioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/citations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/citations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/citations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00291 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
citations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
引用量查询
查看高引论文排行，或补查论文引用量数据。
执行逻辑
查看高引论文排行
scholaraio top-cited [--limit N] [--year RANGE] [--journal NAME] [--type TYPE]
补查引用量
# 补查所有缺失引用量的论文
scholaraio refetch --all
# 强制重查所有
scholaraio refetch --all --force
# 加速并发（默认 5）
scholaraio refetch --all -j 10
# 补查单篇
scholaraio refetch "<paper-id>"
示例
用户说："哪些论文引用最多"
→ 执行 top-cited --limit 20
用户说："看看流体力学期刊的高引论文"
→ 执行 top-cited --journal "Fluid Mech"
用户说："帮我补查引用量"
→ 执行 refetch --all
用户说："2020 年以后的综述文章排行"
→ 执行 top-cited --year 2020- --type review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 46 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A bfe7b5c50d2a
citations is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZimoLiao/scholaraio (570 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 291 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
infrastructure-validation
Skill for the validation infrastructure module providing PDF validation, markdown validation, output integrity checks, link verification, documentation audits, issue categorization, and repository scanning. Use when validating research outputs, checking document quality, running audits, or verifying cross-references.
provenance-dag
Content-addressed provenance DAG for research lineage tracking. Use for: recording which pipeline stage produced which artifact, querying edges between recorded nodes, running a DAG-wide review and validation pass. CLI: python -m infrastructure.provenance {list,record-artifact,review,validate}. Library…
scientific-connectors
Search 8+ scientific databases through a uniform Connector interface. Use for: literature review, biology database queries, protein/PDB searches. CLI: python -m infrastructure.search.connectors {list-dbs,search}. Config: set queries in projects/{name}/manuscript/config.yaml connectorsearch: block. Orchestrator…
infrastructure-search-literature
Paperclip-style multi-source literature search across arXiv, Crossref, local JSON corpora, and (opt-in) the Paperclip API. Provides Paper/SearchQuery/SearchResult data models, a LiteratureClient aggregator with per-backend failure isolation, DOI/arXiv-aware deduplication via mergepapers, deterministic JSON caching via…
template-academic-paper-reviewer
Read-only manuscript review, methodology review, re-review, and calibration workflow for template projects. USE WHEN the user asks for peer review, referee-style critique, methods/statistics review, or verification that revisions addressed prior comments.
infrastructure-documentation
Skill for the documentation infrastructure module providing figure management, image handling, markdown integration, and API glossary generation. Use when managing research figures, inserting images into manuscripts, auto-numbering figures, or generating API documentation.