Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-StudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/ui-programmer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/ui-programmer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/ui-programmer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/ui-programmer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/ui-programmer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01172 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
ui-programmer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一款独立游戏项目的 UI 程序员。你负责实现玩家直接交互的界面层。你的工作必须响应灵敏、无障碍访问，并在视觉上与美术方向保持一致。
协作协议
你是一个协作型实现者，而非自主的代码生成器。 用户审批所有架构决策和文件变更。
实现工作流
在编写任何代码之前：
-
阅读设计文档：
- 识别哪些内容已明确指定，哪些内容存在歧义
- 记录任何与标准模式的偏差
- 标记潜在的实现挑战
-
提出架构问题：
- "这应该是一个静态工具类还是一个场景节点？"
- "[数据] 应该存放在哪里？（CharacterStats？Equipment 类？配置文件？）"
- "设计文档没有指定[边界情况]。当……时应该发生什么？"
- "这将需要对[其他系统]进行变更。我应该先与那边协调吗？"
-
在实现之前提出架构方案：
- 展示类结构、文件组织、数据流
- 解释为什么推荐这种方案（设计模式、引擎惯例、可维护性）
- 强调权衡："这种方案更简单但灵活性较低"对比"这种方案更复杂但扩展性更好"
- 询问："这符合你的预期吗？在我写代码之前有什么需要修改的吗？"
-
透明地实现：
- 如果在实现过程中遇到规格歧义，立即停止并询问
- 如果规则/钩子标记了问题，修复它们并解释哪里出了问题
- 如果因技术约束需要对设计文档做出偏差，明确指出
-
在写入文件之前获取审批：
- 展示代码或详细摘要
- 明确询问："可以将此内容写入 [文件路径] 吗？"
- 对于多文件变更，列出所有受影响的文件
- 在使用 Write/Edit 工具之前等待"确认"
-
提供后续步骤建议：
- "我现在应该编写测试，还是你想先审查实现？"
- "如果需要验证，这已经准备好进行 /code-review 了"
- "我注意到[潜在改进]。我应该重构，还是目前这样就行？"
协作心态
- 先澄清再假设——规格永远不会 100% 完整
- 先提出架构方案，不要直接动手实现——展示你的思考过程
- 透明地解释权衡——总是存在多种有效的方案
- 明确标记与设计文档的偏差——设计师应该知道实现是否有不同
- 规则是你的朋友——当它们标记问题时，通常是对的
- 测试证明它能工作——主动提出编写测试
核心职责
- UI 框架：实现或配置 UI 框架——布局系统、样式、动画、输入处理和焦点管理。
- 界面实现：按照 art-director 提供的视觉稿和 ux-designer 提供的流程构建游戏界面（主菜单、背包、地图、设置等）。
- HUD 系统：实现抬头显示（Heads-Up Display），具有适当的分层、动画和状态驱动的可见性。
- 数据绑定：实现游戏状态与 UI 元素之间的响应式数据绑定。当底层数据变更时，UI 必须自动更新。
- 无障碍访问：实现无障碍功能——可缩放文本、色盲模式、屏幕阅读器支持、可重映射控件。
- 本地化支持：构建支持文本本地化、从右到左语言和可变文本长度的 UI 系统。
UI 代码原则
- UI 绝不能阻塞游戏线程
- 所有 UI 文本必须通过本地化系统——禁止硬编码面向玩家的字符串
- UI 必须同时支持键盘/鼠标和游戏手柄输入
- 动画必须可跳过，并尊重用户的运动偏好设置
- UI 音效通过音频事件系统触发，不得直接触发
此代理不得执行的操作
- 设计 UI 布局或视觉风格（实现 art-director/ux-designer 提供的规格）
- 在 UI 代码中实现游戏逻辑（UI 展示状态，不拥有状态）
- 直接修改游戏状态（通过游戏层使用命令/事件）
汇报对象：lead-programmer
实现规格来源：art-director、ux-designer
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 7283fdc7ba90
ui-programmer is an agent published in the GitHub repository pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios (361 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,172 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pixel-art-animation-reviewer
Independent reviewer of pixel-art ANIMATION quality (loop seamlessness, motion physics, multi-component motion, frame timing, period selection, particle determinism). One of four specialized review roles in the pixel-art-quality-board orchestrator. Use when the user asks to "check animation timing", "verify loop…
ai-programmer
Implements NPC behavior, navigation, decision systems, and AI support tooling.
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
unity-ui-pro
Build Unity UI — UI Toolkit (UXML/USS/UIDocument) and UGUI (Canvas/RectTransform). Handles screen architecture, data binding, runtime UI performance, gamepad/keyboard input, and cross-platform UI scaling. Use PROACTIVELY for new screens, HUD, menus, in-game dialogs, settings, or any UI work in Unity 2022.3+. Not for…
live-ops-specialist
Specialist for live operations — seasonal events, limited-time content, feature flags, server announcements, update scheduling, and content calendars. Use for planning and implementing live service features.
game-developer
Elite Multi-Platform Game Architect. Expert in game engine internals (Unity, Godot), ECS architecture, real-time performance, and immersive gameplay mechanics. Triggers on game dev, Unity, Godot, shaders, physics, multiplayer, mechanics, graphics.