Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implementation.
Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.
Skills + Subagents for React/TypeScript - Use skills for coding guidance, or run recipe workflows for full orchestrated agentic coding with specialized agents.
Guides subagent coordination through implementation workflows. Use when orchestrating multiple agents, managing workflow phases, or determining autonomous execution mode.
Skills + Subagents for fullstack development (backend + React/TypeScript) - Use skills for coding guidance, or run recipe workflows for full orchestrated agentic coding with specialized agents.
Consult multiple AI coding agents (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, plus codex, antigravity, grok and kimi CLIs when installed, and a local ollama model) to get diverse perspectives on coding problems.
Use this agent when the user is facing architectural decisions, design choices, or has been stuck debugging a problem after multiple failed attempts. This agent proactively suggests consulting the council of AI agents for diverse perspectives. Examples: Context: User is designing authentication for their application…
Query multiple AI agents (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, and a local ollama model) for diverse perspectives on architecture decisions, technology choices, debugging dead-ends, and security tradeoffs. Use this whenever the user names the council directly, whatever the topic — ask the council, council review…
Executes council queries by running the query pipeline across selected AI providers (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, Perplexity), displaying formatted responses verbatim, and generating a synthesis of consensus, divergence, and recommendations. Invoked by the ask command during standard (non-agent) council queries.
Executes agent-enhanced council queries by spawning parallel Claude subagents that each query a provider, evaluate response quality, ask follow-up questions, and return structured insights with confidence ratings and blind spot analysis. Invoked when the --agents flag is used or when complex architectural decisions…
Runs a local council when no external AI providers are configured. Spawns N independent Claude subagents (one per role, blind to each other) that each answer the question from a single assigned lens, then synthesizes their perspectives. Invoked by the ask command via --local, or when the user accepts the local-council…
Reviewer-class. Read-only review of what other departments commit to — contract terms, privacy and data handling, risk acceptance, and compliance findings. Holds no write surface. Its findings are not overrulable by the department under review.
Reviewer-class. Read-only security review of what other departments build — authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, and designs that create exposure. Holds no write surface. Blocking findings are not overrulable by the department under review.
Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured…
Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure…
Evaluates a software or startup idea against problem, market, competition, monetization, defensibility, and execution, and returns a verdict rather than encouragement. Use this when an idea needs pressure-testing before anyone builds, when deciding whether something is worth pursuing, when assessing competition or…