AutoResearchClaw is a system that turns a research idea into a scientific paper through autonomous and collaborative AI research workflows. It is for researchers who want agents to investigate questions, run experiments, and produce papers, with optional human guidance. Catalogue skills and agents provide parts of its research workflow.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw/main/.claude/skills/researchclaw/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/researchclaw)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/researchclaw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/researchclaw/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/researchclaw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiming-lab/autoresearchclaw/researchclaw.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 9 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Output Handling · line 116 Model output is used without validation or sanitization. Unvalidated output injected into downstream contexts (SQL, shell, HTML) enables injection attacks and arbitrary code execution.Fix: Validate and sanitize all model output before using it in downstream contexts. Use parameterized queries for SQL, shell quoting for commands, and HTML encoding for web output.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 39 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 47 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 124 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 39 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 47 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 124 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 47 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 63 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01028 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00514 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
researchclaw scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ResearchClaw — Autonomous Research Pipeline Skill
Description
Run ResearchClaw's 23-stage autonomous research pipeline. Given a research topic, this skill orchestrates the entire research workflow: literature review → hypothesis generation → experiment design → code generation & execution → result analysis → paper writing → peer review → final export.
Trigger Conditions
Activate this skill when the user:
- Asks to "research [topic]", "write a paper about [topic]", or "investigate [topic]"
- Wants to run an autonomous research pipeline
- Asks to generate a research paper from scratch
- Mentions "ResearchClaw" by name
Instructions
Prerequisites Check
- Verify config file exists:
ls config.yaml || ls config.researchclaw.example.yaml - If no
config.yaml, create one from the example:cp config.researchclaw.example.yaml config.yaml - Ensure the user's LLM API key is configured in
config.yamlunderllm.api_keyor viallm.api_key_envenvironment variable.
Running the Pipeline
Option A: CLI (recommended)
researchclaw run --topic "Your research topic here" --auto-approve
Options:
--topic/-t: Override the research topic from config--config/-c: Config file path (default:config.yaml)--output/-o: Output directory (default:artifacts/rc-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-HASH/)--from-stage: Resume from a specific stage (e.g.,PAPER_OUTLINE)--auto-approve: Auto-approve gate stages (5, 9, 20) without human input
Option B: Python API
from researchclaw.pipeline.runner import execute_pipeline
from researchclaw.config import RCConfig
from researchclaw.adapters import AdapterBundle
from pathlib import Path
config = RCConfig.load("config.yaml", check_paths=False)
results = execute_pipeline(
run_dir=Path("artifacts/my-run"),
run_id="research-001",
config=config,
adapters=AdapterBundle(),
auto_approve_gates=True,
)
# Check results
for r in results:
print(f"Stage {r.stage.name}: {r.status.value}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 131 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9fd3bf5b8be7
researchclaw is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw (14,361 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,028 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aclawdemy
The academic research platform for AI agents. Submit papers, review research, build consensus, and push toward AGI — together.
adme-property-predictor
Predict ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) properties for drug candidates using cheminformatics models and molecular descriptors. Evaluates drug-likeness, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic profile to guide lead optimization and candidate selection in drug discovery.
arxiv-summarizer-orchestrator
End-to-end orchestration skill for periodic arXiv collection and reporting using three sub-skills: arxiv-search-collector, arxiv-paper-processor, and arxiv-batch-reporter. Supports manual language control across all markdown outputs and Stage-B processing strategy (subagentparallel default max 5, or serial).
baseline-comparison-audit
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent…
eval-design-forensics
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan…
proof-derivation-forensics
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation …