Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frabcd/codex-ai-game-studio --skill team-polishgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frabcd/codex-ai-game-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frabcd/codex-ai-game-studio/team-polish)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frabcd/codex-ai-game-studio/team-polish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frabcd/codex-ai-game-studio/team-polish.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01766 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00883 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
team-polish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to team-polish — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Port provenance: adapted from the pinned upstream source at
984023ddac0d5e27624f2baacde6105e45de375funder MIT; see the repository parity ledger for the exact path and blob.
If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:
Usage:
$ai-game-studio:team-polish [feature or area]— specify the feature or area to polish (e.g.,combat,main menu,inventory system,level-1). Do not usethe available user-input mechanismhere; output the guidance directly.
When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the polish team through a structured pipeline.
Decision Points: At each phase transition, use the available user-input mechanism to present
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
Phase 0: Resolve Review Mode
- If
--review [mode]was passed as an argument, use that mode. - Else read
production/review-mode.txt— use whatever is written there. - Else default to
lean.
Modes:
full— spawn all director and lead gates as describedlean— skip director gates unless they are PHASE-GATE type (CD-PHASE-GATE, TD-PHASE-GATE, PR-PHASE-GATE, AD-PHASE-GATE)solo— skip all director gate spawning entirely; run the skill without any agent gates
Store the resolved mode for use in all subsequent phases.
Director gate skip rule: Before spawning any Tier 1 director or lead for review (outside of PHASE-GATE triggers), apply the resolved mode: skip if solo mode; skip if lean mode and this is not a PHASE-GATE.
Team Composition
- performance-analyst — Profiling, optimization, memory analysis, frame budget
- engine-programmer — Engine-level bottlenecks: rendering pipeline, memory, resource loading (invoke when performance-analyst identifies low-level root causes)
- technical-artist — VFX polish, shader optimization, visual quality
- sound-designer — Audio polish, mixing, ambient layers, feedback sounds
- tools-programmer — Content pipeline tool verification, editor tool stability, automation fixes (invoke when content authoring tools are involved in the polished area)
- qa-tester — Edge case testing, regression testing, soak testing
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 144 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 08a030b490dd
team-polish is a skill published in the GitHub repository frabcd/codex-ai-game-studio (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,766 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to team-polish, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
game-qa
Verify a game with evidence on its selected target runtime. Launch the actual build and prove real rendering, input, the core loop, at least one designed outcome, restart, and explicit limitations without dressing subjective fun up as a certain verdict. Use for test a generated game, QA a game build, check whether the…
blender-asset-validation
Inspect and validate Blender assets technically and visually. Use for .blend, .glb, .gltf, .fbx, or .obj quality checks; topology and export review; evaluated triangle/material/hierarchy metrics; standardized multiview renders; fresh-import verification; or evidence-backed review of an agent-generated mesh.
platform-device-compatibility-matrix
Use when a game needs a platform and device compatibility matrix across OS, hardware, GPU, memory, resolution, input, network, storefront, certification, test evidence, and support policy; not for store metadata preparation.
playtest-evidence
Use when planning or reviewing game playtests that need structured scenarios, participant context, observations, reproduction evidence, severity, and honest separation of observed findings from conclusions.
qa-test-strategy-and-coverage
Use when a game project, milestone, or feature needs a QA test strategy and coverage matrix across risk, test levels, platforms, environments, ownership, automation, regression, evidence, and exit criteria; not for one playtest session.
playtesting-a-feature
Use when about to claim a gameplay feature is done, shipped, or working — requires actually running the game and walking through the feature before declaring completion. Static diagnostics and type checks do not count as playtesting.