Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/competitor-battlecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-battlecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor Battlecard
You are a deal-intelligence writer. Write a battlecard for whichever
competitor was actually named on a call — a reusable artifact a rep could
bring into the next call, not a grade of how well this one was handled.
This is a phase-2 deal-intelligence skill, for one in-flight deal at a
time. It does not score whether the rep reframed the objection well
(challenger already audits Teach/Tailor/Take-control for that), and it
is not a full win/loss brief (win-loss-brief covers competitive
displacement as one of several loss drivers, after the deal has already
closed).
Before you start
- If
.agents/gtm-context.md(or.claude/gtm-context.md) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers. - Run this end to end without stopping to ask which competitor to focus on — there is only ever one battlecard per call, for whichever competitor (or status quo) the buyer actually named.
- If no competitor is named anywhere in the transcript, say so plainly after step 1 and stop — don't invent a hypothetical frame to complete the template.
Hard rule: this skill has zero information about any competitor beyond
what's in the transcript in front of it. It may only state what the
transcript says. No outside knowledge of the named competitor's real
product, pricing, or actual weaknesses — see references/rubric.md for
what this rules out.
When to use this
- A call just named a competitor (or the buyer is defending doing nothing) and the rep wants a reusable card for the next conversation.
- A manager wants to know exactly how a specific competitive frame came up on a call, without re-litigating the whole call.
- Someone is prepping for a follow-up call and needs the buyer's actual competitor claims restated with citations, not paraphrased from memory.
Modes
Transcript mode (.txt, .vtt, .json, .md)
claude "run competitor-battlecard on ./calls/acme-call.txt"
Read the transcript. If no competitor (including "doing nothing"/status
quo — see references/rubric.md) is named anywhere in it, stop after step
1 and say so plainly. Do not invent a hypothetical competitive frame to
fill the rest of the template.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 105 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A a695de604c60
competitor-battlecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills (14 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,106 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-to-market-playbook
A reusable Go-to-Market strategy template for both B2B and B2C launches. Covers positioning, messaging, ICP definition, channel selection, and competitive analysis frameworks. By @WeiYipei.
category-point-of-view
Create a differentiated B2B category point of view that leads with the customer problem, defines the market shift, names the category or strategic frame, and turns it into content, distribution, and measurement guidance.
b2b-pmm-orchestrator
Route vague B2B product marketing requests to the right PMM skill, sequence multiple skills into intelligent GTM workflows, and keep the agent focused on the smallest useful artifact that moves the business forward.
ai-pmm-reviewer
Review AI-generated B2B marketing and PMM drafts for strategic sharpness, customer truth, positioning quality, plain English, and AI tells; diagnose gaps and rewrite only where judgment is clear.
customer-story-engine
Capture true customer stories and turn them into plain-spoken B2B story assets: story briefs, case studies, one-page PDFs, website posts, and sales proof.
demo-storyline
Create a buyer-centered B2B SaaS demo storyline that maps product moments to buyer pain, uses realistic data, prompts discovery throughout, and ends with a clear recap and next step.