technical-discovery

technical-discovery is a skill for Claude Code from zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills. It costs 71 tokens per session (1,099 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review of a technical sales conversation or pipeline record to see whether a proposed product trial has real technical groundwork. It covers the current systems, desired future setup, trial scope, and people involved in the technical decision.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review solution-fit calls, prepare a proof of concept, or find pipeline deals entering technical evaluation without documented technical fit.
Why use it?
It helps distinguish a trial supported by facts from one based mainly on hope. Missing technical information can be addressed before time is spent on the trial.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is claude "run technical-discovery on ./calls/acme-tech-disco.txt".

Part of the gtm-skills plugin — 41 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review solution-fit calls, prepare a proof of concept, or find pipeline deals entering technical evaluation without documented technical fit.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install gtm-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 41 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-discovery

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-discovery

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/technical-discovery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,099 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00071 $0.01099
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00549
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00220
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00110

Measured 12d ago against content hash 6dc640aa32dd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-discovery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/technical-discovery/SKILL.md · 124 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GTM Technical Discovery Audit

You are a solutions-engineering call auditor. Your goal is to tell a rep or SE whether a POC is being scoped on real technical groundwork, or on hope.

Audits a technical/solution-fit call against seven dimensions specific to whether a POC or technical evaluation is set up to succeed. Sits between meeting-to-qualify (establishes the deal is real) and qualify-to-poc (the go/no-go gate right before pilot work starts) — this one checks the technical legwork in between, not the commercial qualification on either side of it.

When to use this

  • A solutions engineer or AE just ran a technical discovery call and wants a structured read before scoping a POC.
  • A manager is reviewing whether a deal heading into POC actually has the technical groundwork to support one.
  • RevOps wants to sweep pipeline for deals entering a technical-evaluation stage with no documented technical fit.

Before you start

  • If .agents/gtm-context.md (or .claude/gtm-context.md) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers.
  • Run this end to end in one pass. Don't stop to ask which call or how to read an ambiguous moment — apply the rubric's guidance, decide, note the assumption once, and move on.
  • If the transcript is a business-only call with no technical content, say so in one line and still score whichever dimensions the conversation touches.

Modes

Transcript mode (.txt, .vtt, .json, .md)

claude "run technical-discovery on ./calls/acme-tech-disco.txt"
  1. Read the whole transcript before scoring anything — scope, stakeholders, or a success metric can surface late.
  2. Score each of the seven dimensions in references/rubric.md independently. For every dimension, output Status (Covered/Partial/ Missed), Evidence (quote or timestamp, or Unclear rather than a guess), and a Note if not fully covered.
  3. Run the rubric's reads-well-too check before finalizing.
  4. Write the output in the exact shape under ## Output format.

Read the full file on GitHub · 124 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 124 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 6dc640aa32dd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-discovery is a skill published in the GitHub repository zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills (14 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,099 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

go-to-market-playbook

A reusable Go-to-Market strategy template for both B2B and B2C launches. Covers positioning, messaging, ICP definition, channel selection, and competitive analysis frameworks. By @WeiYipei.

Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills · 48 tokens

category-point-of-view

Create a differentiated B2B category point of view that leads with the customer problem, defines the market shift, names the category or strategic frame, and turns it into content, distribution, and measurement guidance.

adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills · 46 tokens

b2b-pmm-orchestrator

Route vague B2B product marketing requests to the right PMM skill, sequence multiple skills into intelligent GTM workflows, and keep the agent focused on the smallest useful artifact that moves the business forward.

adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills · 49 tokens

ai-pmm-reviewer

Review AI-generated B2B marketing and PMM drafts for strategic sharpness, customer truth, positioning quality, plain English, and AI tells; diagnose gaps and rewrite only where judgment is clear.

adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills · 45 tokens

customer-story-engine

Capture true customer stories and turn them into plain-spoken B2B story assets: story briefs, case studies, one-page PDFs, website posts, and sales proof.

adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills · 38 tokens

demo-storyline

Create a buyer-centered B2B SaaS demo storyline that maps product moments to buyer pain, uses realistic data, prompts discovery throughout, and ends with a clear recap and next step.

adam-lagerhausen/b2b-marketing-skills · 41 tokens