Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio/godot-quality-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio/godot-quality-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio/godot-quality-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio/godot-quality-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio/godot-quality-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00185 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
godot-quality-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed LGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed LGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 30e5cd66f512
godot-quality-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bgrenat/godot-game-dev-studio (24 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed LGPL-3.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 185 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
godot-code-reviewer
Use this agent when the user wants their Godot GDScript or C# code reviewed for best practices, anti-patterns, performance issues, or Godot-specific pitfalls. Also use when completing a major feature and wanting a quality check. Examples: Context: User wants a code review. user: "Review my player controller for Godot…
godot-reviewer
Reviews Godot architecture, scene structure, resource usage, and engine-specific risks.
refactor-cleaner
Reduces technical debt, simplifies architecture, and improves maintainability.
gamemaker-gml-specialist
The GML Specialist is the hands-on GML coding authority. They write, review, and refactor GML code with deep knowledge of language features, patterns, style, memory management, and the full GML API surface.
file-verifier
External semantic verifier for a single Godot file (.gd / .tscn / .tres / .gdshader). Reads the file fresh — no context from the writer — checks against Godot 4.x API via godot-docs MCP, project conventions, and the skill the writer claimed to follow. Returns findings only; does not rewrite. Invoked after a batch of…
code-reviewer
Review GDScript and scene files against Godot 4.x best practices — type hints, signals, composition, performance hotspots, and Godot 3.x leftovers. Use after any non-trivial change or before committing.