Ask Claude to challenge a change, plan, or prior Claude conclusion in read-only mode, including a resumed follow-up. Use for adversarial review of assumptions, rollback, races, reliability, security, and user impact.
Audit a repository or prepare it for an open-source release. Audit mode reports whether the README matches the code and whether stated rules are actually enforced; launch mode walks a repo to release-ready with opt-in checklist packs and README templates. Use when asked to "audit this repo," "is this repo ready to go…
Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use…
Review an ADR the user has written in docs/adr/. Use when the user says an ADR is ready for review or asks for feedback on a decision record. Never use this to write or rewrite an ADR for them.
Create or check concise reviewer-visible PR context and practical proof when an authorized workflow publishes an update or prepares it for merge. Lead with what broke and how it is fixed, use actual product screenshots for static UI changes and recordings for motion or manual interaction, keep technical diagrams as…
Use when reviewing a project's architecture for design pattern applicability -- either validating a design document before implementation, or analyzing an existing codebase for pattern improvement opportunities.
Act as a senior engineering coach. Review an engineer's recent work across PRs, code reviews, issues, and commits; produce an evidence-cited SWOT and a short list of prioritized, behavioural actions — with room for the engineer to add context and challenge findings.
Use when reviewing production readiness, resilience, failure modes, or reliability of code, services, or system designs. Trigger for requests about error handling, retries, timeouts, circuit breakers, graceful degradation, observability, DR/RPO/RTO, abuse resilience, quota exhaustion, production architecture…
Use for a GitHub pull request review run to inspect the exact head revision, changed files, and checks, then publish one evidence-backed managed review comment without approving or modifying the pull request.
Review a pull request or a working-tree diff using structural analysis rather than reading the diff alone. Use when asked to review a PR, review changes, check a diff before merging, or say whether a change is safe to land. Combines Prism's impact analysis with whatever GitHub and issue-tracker tools the editor…
Implement same-repository GitHub Issues into a reviewed pull request, or review and fix an existing PR, iterating with fresh independent read-only native subagents selected adaptively from the change risk until no actionable feedback remains. Use for issue-to-PR implementation or iterative PR review/fix work.
Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and style analysis for Python, TypeScript, and Go. Detects OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, N+1 queries, race conditions, and logic errors before they reach production.
Lint review completo de un módulo Drupal 11 combinando 4 fuentes en paralelo — PHPStan level 5 + phpstan-drupal, PHPCS Drupal/DrupalPractice, agente drupal-qa (estándares) y agente drupal-security (OWASP). Dos modos — completo (todo el módulo) y diff (solo archivos cambiados vs develop). Genera informe markdown…
Challenges decisions, plans, and code by systematically arguing the opposing side. Surfaces risks, pokes holes in assumptions, and stress-tests thinking before committing. Supports intensity levels (gentle, balanced, ruthless, linus) and works with conversation context or a specific file reference. Trigger on requests…
Multi-role review of a plan, design doc, PR, or code change from four independent hats — Senior Software Engineer, Engineer, AI Education Engineer, and Product Owner — each producing a 0–100% confidence score with mandatory written justification AND ranked P0–P3 findings, then a fifth deduplicator agent that merges…
Parallel multi-agent code review using Agent Teams with 4 specialized reviewers. Spawns a coordinated team of security, performance, test coverage, and code quality agents. Teammates can share findings with each other for cross-domain insights. Produces unified report with severity-ranked findings saved to /output/.…
The door check for prototype and AI-built apps - decides whether an app gets to meet real users, and says exactly why not. Use this whenever someone asks if their app is ready to launch, deploy, or go live; wants a pre-launch, security, or "what am I missing" review; mentions moving from prototype to production; or…
Self-contained playbook for rigorous PR review: state inspection, design-intent hunting, verification rules (cite sources, walk commits, verify artifacts), agent dispatch, falsifiable-matrix output, GitHub posting only with explicit authorization. Generic, sequential phases.
★not rated 2 yesterdayA55 tokens
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: