Claude Code Game Studios is a setup that organizes Claude Code into a coordinated game-development team of specialized AI agents. It supports game projects across design, programming, art, audio, narrative, quality assurance, and production, with skills and workflows for coordinating that work.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/design-systemnpx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill design-systemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-StudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/design-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/design-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/design-system.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.09670 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.04835 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01934 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00967 |
Grade A, and why
design-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- design-system — 100% identical, 13 lines differ
- design-system — 89% identical, 34 lines differ
- design-system — 88% identical, 74 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 872 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When this skill is invoked:
1. Parse Arguments & Validate
Resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
See .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
A system name or retrofit path is required. If missing:
- Check if
design/gdd/systems-index.mdexists. - If it exists: read it, find the highest-priority system with status "Not Started" or equivalent, and use
AskUserQuestion:- Prompt: "The next system in your design order is [system-name] ([priority] | [layer]). Start designing it?"
- Options:
[A] Yes — design [system-name]/[B] Pick a different system/[C] Stop here - If [A]: proceed with that system name. If [B]: ask which system to design (plain text). If [C]: exit.
- If no systems index exists, fail with:
"Usage:
/design-system <system-name>— e.g.,/design-system movementOr to fill gaps in an existing GDD:/design-system retrofit design/gdd/[system-name].mdNo systems index found. Run/map-systemsfirst to map your systems and get the design order."
Detect retrofit mode:
If the argument starts with retrofit or the argument is a file path to an
existing .md file in design/gdd/, enter retrofit mode:
- Read the existing GDD file.
- Identify which of the 8 required sections are present (scan for section headings). Required sections: Overview, Player Fantasy, Detailed Design/Rules, Formulas, Edge Cases, Dependencies, Tuning Knobs, Acceptance Criteria.
- Identify which sections contain only placeholder text (
[To be designed]or equivalent — blank, a single line, or obviously incomplete). - Present to the user before doing anything:
## Retrofit: [System Name] File: design/gdd/[filename].md Sections already written (will not be touched): ✓ [section name] ✓ [section name] Missing or incomplete sections (will be authored): ✗ [section name] — missing ✗ [section name] — placeholder only - Ask: "Shall I fill the [N] missing sections? I will not modify any existing content."
- If yes: proceed to Phase 2 (Gather Context) as normal, but in Phase 3 skip creating the skeleton (file already exists) and in Phase 4 skip sections that are already complete. Only run the section cycle for missing/ incomplete sections.
- Never overwrite existing section content. Use Edit tool to replace only
[To be designed]placeholders or empty section bodies.
If NOT in retrofit mode, normalize the system name to kebab-case for the
filename (e.g., "combat system" becomes combat-system).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 872 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A eae2be7d9ae5
design-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios (24,822 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 9,670 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
game-build
Build a risk-matched whitebox or the approved production game for its target runtime. Turn GAMEDESIGN, and ARTDIRECTION when production begins, into a minimal BUILDBRIEF and a runnable candidate that can be iterated with replayable evidence. Use for prototype the riskiest design question, implement the approved game…
novel-game-analyze
Deconstruct a novel for game adaptation. Compress a raw novel, deconstruction library, or writing project into a SOURCEBIBLE with cited textual evidence, extracting world rules, player verbs, spaces, character will, systems, and visual anchors — without inventing a genre yet. Use for gameable book analysis, analyze a…
novel-to-game
Turn a novel into a fully playable game on the selected target platform. Orchestrates the whole adaptation pipeline — requirements intake, gameable deconstruction, concept selection, world and visual design, target-runtime build, and evidence-based QA — for a novel in any language. Use for novel to game, story to…
game-concept
Design game concepts from a novel. From SOURCEBIBLE and PRODUCTBRIEF, generate three genuinely different directions on the dimensions still unlocked, then pick the most worthwhile playable prototype using hard vetoes and explicit trade-offs. Use for what game should this novel become, compare game concepts, choose a…
game-world-design
Design game experience, systems, and levels. Converge the chosen concept into one GAMEDESIGN defining the player promise, core loop, how the world responds, the systems actually needed, level pacing, feedback, failure, and a fully playable prototype. Use for design the game world, deepen the gameplay and levels, write…
game-qa
Verify a game with evidence on its selected target runtime. Launch the actual build and prove real rendering, input, the core loop, at least one designed outcome, restart, and explicit limitations without dressing subjective fun up as a certain verdict. Use for test a generated game, QA a game build, check whether the…